Tirsvad
ef256a9e4d
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/git-workflows: Release / release (pull_request) Successful in 21s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (pull_request) Successful in 37s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (pull_request) Successful in 4m19s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Successful in 15s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish accepted milestones / publish (push) Successful in 42s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (push) Successful in 40s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (push) Successful in 5m43s
68 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
# RC-001 review
|
||
|
||
## Metadata
|
||
| Key | Value |
|
||
| --- | --- |
|
||
| ID | RC-001 |
|
||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 2026-11-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [fe0f272] |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||
|
||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001]
|
||
- Scope: full review
|
||
- Language and domain: en / it
|
||
- Language reviewer: none, the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain
|
||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||
|
||
## Checklist Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost–Benefit says the assessment is qualitative because there is no budget and no revenue |
|
||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Four risks, each with impact and mitigation |
|
||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Six success criteria with targets and measures, for example `python -m pytest` exits with 0 |
|
||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate |
|
||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 only |
|
||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, Larman and ISO/IEC 25010:2023 |
|
||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists |
|
||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation: Proceed, with a one-sentence rationale |
|
||
|
||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`, no placeholder |
|
||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list |
|
||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | BC-001 prose and table cells are in English |
|
||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL, IT Professional English for SA, as the registry gives |
|
||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Only standard IT terms are used (Flask, route, decorator, test); the project has no `DICT` and no PO-specific term needs one |
|
||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English |
|
||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `.en.md`/`.da.md` twin exists beside the document |
|
||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | No change of language or domain; this is the first version |
|
||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | AI as stand-in for S01 read the terms as correct IT usage; S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-11-06. Stand-in decision, not independent; open to challenge in the run summary |
|
||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (BC, SA, MIL, GIF, HTML, PR) are spelled out or are standard IT abbreviations |
|
||
|
||
## Overall Verdict
|
||
|
||
Go — All Mandatory and Optional criteria pass for BC-001 and QC-LANG-001; no blocking finding.
|
||
|
||
## Action Items
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| None | S01 | 2026-11-06 |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
[BC-001]: ../../docs/business-case.md
|
||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||
[fe0f272]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/055-higher-lower/commit/fe0f2722c25220f6efa3b9b2f3d5e01e7f6d90dc
|