Files
Tirsvad ef256a9e4d
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/git-workflows: Release / release (pull_request) Successful in 21s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (pull_request) Successful in 37s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (pull_request) Successful in 4m19s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Successful in 15s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish accepted milestones / publish (push) Successful in 42s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (push) Successful in 40s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (push) Successful in 5m43s
Resolve review record commit links
2026-11-06 12:17:46 +08:00

4.4 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

RC-001 review

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-001
CrossReference BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-11-06 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen AI as stand-in for S01 Initial version fe0f272

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: BC-001
  • Checklist used: QC-BC-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: en / it
  • Language reviewer: none, the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified Pass Cost–Benefit says the assessment is qualitative because there is no budget and no revenue
2 Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation Pass Four risks, each with impact and mitigation
3 Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations Pass Six success criteria with targets and measures, for example python -m pytest exits with 0
4 Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope Pass ### In Scope and ### Out of Scope are separate
5 Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline Pass Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 only
6 Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) Pass Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, Larman and ISO/IEC 25010:2023
7 Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another Pass Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists
8 Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation Pass Recommendation: Proceed, with a one-sentence rationale

Language and Domain Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder Pass Metadata has `Language
2 Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list Pass en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list
3 The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language Pass BC-001 prose and table cells are in English
4 The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type Pass Register is IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL, IT Professional English for SA, as the registry gives
5 Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms Pass Only standard IT terms are used (Flask, route, decorator, test); the project has no DICT and no PO-specific term needs one
6 Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English Pass Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English
7 No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document Pass No .en.md/.da.md twin exists beside the document
8 A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again Pass No change of language or domain; this is the first version
9 A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly Pass AI as stand-in for S01 read the terms as correct IT usage; S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-11-06. Stand-in decision, not independent; open to challenge in the run summary
10 Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language Pass Abbreviations (BC, SA, MIL, GIF, HTML, PR) are spelled out or are standard IT abbreviations

Overall Verdict

Go — All Mandatory and Optional criteria pass for BC-001 and QC-LANG-001; no blocking finding.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None S01 2026-11-06