Files
055-higher-lower/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
Tirsvad ef256a9e4d
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/git-workflows: Release / release (pull_request) Successful in 21s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (pull_request) Successful in 37s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (pull_request) Successful in 4m19s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Successful in 15s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish accepted milestones / publish (push) Successful in 42s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (push) Successful in 40s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (push) Successful in 5m43s
Resolve review record commit links
2026-11-06 12:17:46 +08:00

69 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# RC-002 review
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-11-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [fe0f272] |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none, the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have power, interest and quadrant |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01–S03 are unique and stable |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization and levels are explicit |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | CM-001 to CM-003 map channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (small code vs. three-language documentation) with a mitigation |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to BC-001 objectives |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a business statement and a FURPS+ attribute |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language table; each stakeholder can find their row |
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | CN-001 to CN-007, each with its stakeholder |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`, no placeholder |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | SA-001 prose and table cells are in English |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL, IT Professional English for SA, as the registry gives |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Only standard IT terms are used (Flask, route, decorator, test); the project has no `DICT` and no PO-specific term needs one |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `.en.md`/`.da.md` twin exists beside the document |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | No change of language or domain; this is the first version |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | AI as stand-in for S01 read the terms as correct IT usage; S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-11-06. Stand-in decision, not independent; open to challenge in the run summary |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (BC, SA, MIL, GIF, HTML, PR) are spelled out or are standard IT abbreviations |
## Overall Verdict
Go — All criteria pass; no blocking finding.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | 2026-11-06 |
---
[SA-001]: ../../docs/stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[fe0f272]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/055-higher-lower/commit/fe0f2722c25220f6efa3b9b2f3d5e01e7f6d90dc