# RC-002 review

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-11-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [fe0f272] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none, the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have power, interest and quadrant |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01–S03 are unique and stable |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organization and levels are explicit |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | CM-001 to CM-003 map channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (small code vs. three-language documentation) with a mitigation |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to BC-001 objectives |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a business statement and a FURPS+ attribute |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language table; each stakeholder can find their row |
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | CN-001 to CN-007, each with its stakeholder |

## Language and Domain Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`, no placeholder |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | SA-001 prose and table cells are in English |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL, IT Professional English for SA, as the registry gives |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Only standard IT terms are used (Flask, route, decorator, test); the project has no `DICT` and no PO-specific term needs one |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `.en.md`/`.da.md` twin exists beside the document |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | No change of language or domain; this is the first version |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | AI as stand-in for S01 read the terms as correct IT usage; S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-11-06. Stand-in decision, not independent; open to challenge in the run summary |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (BC, SA, MIL, GIF, HTML, PR) are spelled out or are standard IT abbreviations |

## Overall Verdict

Go — All criteria pass; no blocking finding.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | 2026-11-06 |

---

[SA-001]: ../../docs/stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[fe0f272]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/055-higher-lower/commit/fe0f2722c25220f6efa3b9b2f3d5e01e7f6d90dc