054-flask/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-003-project-plan.md

Review of PP-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-003
CrossReference	PP-001, QC-PP-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-11-06	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	73a5a95

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: PP-001
• Checklist used: QC-PP-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit	Pass	Start 2026-11-06, end 2026-11-10, constraint: one PR per milestone (BC-001 Constraints).
2	Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner	Pass	Five gateways, each with document, decision date and owner S01.
3	Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked MIL-* document	Pass	Decision dates equal the Target Date of each MIL document and lie inside the window.
4	Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage)	Pass	Scope Coverage table maps every In Scope item to a gateway.
5	Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order	Pass	Chain MIL-001 to MIL-005 is acyclic and matches the dates.
6	The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go	Pass	Dependencies section: later gateways shift; S01 decides the end date.
7	Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI	N-A	Owners and reviewers use S01; no governance document (GOV) exists in this small project, so no RACI to match.
8	Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason	Pass	Planning Assumptions lists sources; changes will be recorded in Version History.
9	Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there	Pass	Three plan risks with mitigation; two trace to BC-001 risks.
10	Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan	Pass	Open Issues are current and do not contradict the plan.
11	Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its MIL-* document	Pass	Main deliverables match the Deliverable sections of the MIL documents.
12	Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why	Pass	Stories column says none (technical tasks).
13	The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other	Pass	Gantt bars match the table; chain matches Dependencies.
14	Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced	Pass	Milestone column says not yet synced.
15	The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History	Pass	Single plan; Version History present.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English, the PO language (registry PO language = en).
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register: IT Executive English for BC/PP/MIL, IT Professional English for SA/DICT; no implementation detail in the executive documents beyond file names.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Terms follow docs/dictionary.md (DICT-001): greeting, home page, lecture step, local environment, wrapper.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No *.en.md or other translated twin exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version; no earlier language to compare.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	Reviewer S01 reads English and works in the IT domain (stand-in, not independent).
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	FURPS+, BC, SA etc. are defined by the framework; ISO/IEC 25010 named in full.

Overall Verdict

Go — All mandatory criteria pass (7 is not applicable).

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---