# Review of PP-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-003 | | CrossReference | [PP-001], [QC-PP-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-11-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [73a5a95] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [PP-001] - Checklist used: [QC-PP-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit | Pass | Start 2026-11-06, end 2026-11-10, constraint: one PR per milestone (BC-001 Constraints). | | 2 | Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner | Pass | Five gateways, each with document, decision date and owner S01. | | 3 | Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked `MIL-*` document | Pass | Decision dates equal the Target Date of each MIL document and lie inside the window. | | 4 | Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage) | Pass | Scope Coverage table maps every In Scope item to a gateway. | | 5 | Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order | Pass | Chain MIL-001 to MIL-005 is acyclic and matches the dates. | | 6 | The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go | Pass | Dependencies section: later gateways shift; S01 decides the end date. | | 7 | Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI | N-A | Owners and reviewers use S01; no governance document (GOV) exists in this small project, so no RACI to match. | | 8 | Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason | Pass | Planning Assumptions lists sources; changes will be recorded in Version History. | | 9 | Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there | Pass | Three plan risks with mitigation; two trace to BC-001 risks. | | 10 | Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan | Pass | Open Issues are current and do not contradict the plan. | | 11 | Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its `MIL-*` document | Pass | Main deliverables match the Deliverable sections of the MIL documents. | | 12 | Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why | Pass | Stories column says `none (technical tasks)`. | | 13 | The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other | Pass | Gantt bars match the table; chain matches Dependencies. | | 14 | Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced | Pass | Milestone column says `not yet synced`. | | 15 | The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History | Pass | Single plan; Version History present. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English, the PO language (registry `PO language` = en). | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English for BC/PP/MIL, IT Professional English for SA/DICT; no implementation detail in the executive documents beyond file names. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms follow `docs/dictionary.md` (DICT-001): greeting, home page, lecture step, local environment, wrapper. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other translated twin exists. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no earlier language to compare. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Reviewer S01 reads English and works in the IT domain (stand-in, not independent). | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | FURPS+, BC, SA etc. are defined by the framework; ISO/IEC 25010 named in full. | ## Overall Verdict Go — All mandatory criteria pass (7 is not applicable). ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | - | --- [PP-001]: ../../project-plan.md [QC-PP-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-project-plan.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [73a5a95]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/054-flask/commit/73a5a95d28db041e4f27342cc552e18f7d386410