Tirsvad
b823d1f405
Add the Business Case (BC-001), Stakeholder Analysis (SA-001), Project Plan (PP-001) and two milestones: MIL-001 Colour Palette and MIL-002 Spot Painting. Record their reviews as RC-001 to RC-004 (all Go, self-review accepted by S01). The PO language is English and the domain is IT. The milestones and their 13 tasks are synced as Gitea milestones 68 and 69 and issues #1 to #13.
74 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
74 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
# Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis SA-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-002 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [BC-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-07 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version (draft prepared by the assistant for S01 to confirm)<br>S02 removed on S01's instruction; self-review confirmed by S01 | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001], together with [QC-LANG-001] because the Stakeholder Analysis is written in the PO language
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
|
|
- Language reviewer: none. S01 reads English and knows the IT domain. S01 is also the author; S01 accepted a documented self-review on 2026-10-07 (Action Item 1)
|
|
|
|
**Status of this record:** final. The assistant read the document against
|
|
every criterion and recorded what it found; S01 confirmed the open points on
|
|
2026-10-07 and the verdict is `Go`.
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, the only stakeholder, is classified HIGH/HIGH, Manage Closely; the quadrant follows the standard grid |
|
|
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | S01, unique; [BC-001] and the review records already cite it. S02 was removed on S01's instruction before any review gave `Go`, so no ID was reused |
|
|
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role and Organization columns filled, with explicit levels |
|
|
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Mapped to the review gates of the workflow, since no milestone document exists yet. The mapping to `MIL-*` IDs can be added in a later version once they exist |
|
|
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | 3 conflicts, each with a mitigation. The reviewer-independence conflict is mitigated by S01's accepted self-review (Action Item 1) |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces S01's concerns to O1 to O5 of [BC-001]; the objective numbers match the Business Case |
|
|
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Every concern has a FURPS+ attribute; the acronym is spelled out in the Purpose |
|
|
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain table entries; S01 has a single row to read |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | The `Language` row says `en` and the `Domain` row says `it`; `check-languages.sh --list` reports both |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list ("Software and IT") |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; tool names are established technical terms |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Registry gives IT Professional English for SA; the text uses the grid, FURPS+ and RACI terms without over-explaining them |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The project has no Domain Dictionary (`DICT`), so there is no list to check against; the terms *dot*, *palette*, *painting*, *grid* and *phase* match [BC-001]. S01 confirmed on 2026-10-07 that a dictionary is not needed (Action Item 2) |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings follow the SA reference exactly |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | Only `docs/stakeholder-analysis.md` exists |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; there is no previous accepted version |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01 confirmed on 2026-10-07 that the domain terms are used correctly (Action Item 2). S01 is also the author; the self-review was accepted by S01 (Action Item 1) |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | FURPS+ and RACI are spelled out in the Purpose; S01 and BC-001 are IDs defined by the document set |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every criterion of [QC-SA-001] and of [QC-LANG-001] passes (criterion 8 of [QC-LANG-001] is N-A for a first version). S01 accepted the documented self-review, confirmed the defaults and the stakeholder list, and confirmed on 2026-10-07 that the domain terms are used correctly and that no Domain Dictionary is needed. All action items are closed.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| # | Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Name a reviewer who is not the author, or record here that the review is a documented self-review accepted by S01 (the same decision as RC-001 Action Item 1). **Closed 2026-10-07:** S01 accepted a documented self-review | S01 | 2026-10-09 |
|
|
| 2 | Confirm that the domain terms in [SA-001] are used correctly (QC-LANG-001 criterion 9), and that a Domain Dictionary is not needed for this project. **Closed 2026-10-07:** S01 confirmed both points | S01 | 2026-10-09 |
|
|
| 3 | Confirm that S01 and S02 are the only stakeholders, or name others (for example a second reviewer). **Closed 2026-10-07:** S01 is the only stakeholder; S02 was removed from [SA-001] and [BC-001] | S01 | 2026-10-09 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
|
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
|
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-language-domain.md
|