Tirsvad
8ef00aafaa
Add RC-001 to RC-005 for the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis and MIL-001 to MIL-003, checked against their QC checklists, and a traceability matrix. The reviews found a missing duration constraint in the Business Case; BC-001 v2 adds it, and SA-001 v2 records the sign-off. Register RC and TM in the artifact registry. Plan MIL-004 (review the source against QC-PY-001, add a CI workflow) as Proposed, with Business Case objective 6, a Project Plan gateway row and a matrix entry. The milestone is not yet synced to the git host. No issue closed: planning and review documents only, no code changed.
2.6 KiB
2.6 KiB
RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis Review
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | SA-001, QC-SA-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001 (docs/stakeholder-analysis.md)
- Checklist used: QC-SA-001 (
QC-SA-001) - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S03 each have power, interest and quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are used by every other document. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Levels are stated as High/Low in the table, with organisation and role. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-003. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (assignment names vs testable structure) with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table maps each stakeholder to [BC-001] objectives. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain language, short; each stakeholder can find their own row. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all criteria pass. The Sign-Off row said Pending review and was updated to the Go in SA-001 v2.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| Record the sign-off in SA-001 (done in v2) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |