Resolve pending commit links in review and planning documents

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add SQA review records and plan MIL-004 Code Review and CI
2026-10-06 20:43:23 +08:00 · 2026-10-06 20:42:51 +08:00 · 2026-10-06 13:57:11 +02:00
11 changed files with 429 additions and 49 deletions
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ document of a type. `Primary File` may contain a glob (e.g.
 | BC | Business Case | docs/business-case.md | 002 |
 | SA | Stakeholder Analysis | docs/stakeholder-analysis.md | 002 |
 | PP | Project Plan | docs/project-plan.md | 002 |
-| MIL | Milestone / Gateway | docs/milestones/*.md | 004 |
+| MIL | Milestone / Gateway | docs/milestones/*.md | 005 |
 | RC | SQA Review Record | docs/sqa/reviews/rc-*.md | 006 |
 | TM | Traceability Matrix | docs/sqa/traceability-matrix.md | 002 |
 ## Languages
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| 2026-10-05 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c0c3940] |
+| 2026-10-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added duration constraint (RC-001 action) | [8ef00aa] |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added objective 6 and scope for code review and CI | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ participants and for viewers browsing the repository.
 3. Cover the behaviour with automated pytest tests.
 4. Document how to set up a local `.venv` and run the program and tests.
 5. Publish the repository with a description, topics and README.
 6. Review the source code against the Python quality checklist and run the tests and code checks automatically on every push.
 ## Scope
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ participants and for viewers browsing the repository.
 - `pyproject.toml`, Python `.gitignore`, `Doxyfile`, `README.md`.
 - Project documents under `docs/`.
 - Repository description and topics on the git host.
 - A review record for the source code and a CI workflow (MIL-004).
 ### Out of Scope
@@ -109,6 +112,7 @@ professional project hygiene, and the goal of sharing readable solutions.
 - Constants live in `constants.py`.
 - Source files use Doxygen comments.
 - Nothing is committed or pushed unless the user asks.
 - Duration: one week, 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12.
 ## Cost–Benefit Assessment
@@ -131,4 +135,4 @@ Proceed — the scope is small, well specified and delivers a reusable example.
 ---
 [SA-001]: ./stakeholder-analysis.md
-[c0c3940]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/c0c3940551db0d7d96492cc734976d0436051ff9
+[8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
 # MIL-004 Code Review and CI
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | MIL-004 |
 | CrossReference | [BC-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Purpose
 Decide whether the source code has been reviewed against the Python quality checklist and is checked automatically on every push.
 ## Deliverable
 `RC-006` review record for the source code, fixes for its findings, a CI workflow running the tests and code checks, and a README section describing it.
 ## Go / No-Go Criteria
 | # | Criterion (objectively checkable) | Go | No-Go |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | `docs/sqa/reviews/` has an RC record for the source against `QC-PY-001` | Present with a verdict | Missing |
 | 2 | Every Fail in that record has a closed action item or a recorded deviation | All handled | Open Fail |
 | 3 | The CI workflow runs pytest, ruff check, ruff format --check and mypy on push and pull request | All four run | Any missing |
 | 4 | The latest CI run on `main` is green | Green | Red or none |
 | 5 | README describes the CI and the matching local commands | Present | Missing |
 ## Dependencies
 | Depends on | Reason |
 | --- | --- |
 | MIL-003 | Tests and metadata must exist before they are reviewed and automated |
 ## Traceability
 | Business Case objective / KPI / user story | Reference |
 | --- | --- |
 | Objective 6 (review and CI), Objective 4 | [BC-001] |
 ## Ownership
 | Role | Stakeholder ID (SA) |
 | --- | --- |
 | Owner | S01 |
 | Approving reviewer | S01 |
 ## Target Date
 2026-10-12 — inside the duration constraint in [BC-001].
 ## Tasks
 | # | Task | Summary | Needs its own Use Case/User Story? | Reference |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | Review source code against QC-PY-001 | Create RC-006 with `new-artifact.sh RC` for `src/` and `tests/` against `framework/qc/qc-programming-python.md`. Criterion 10 (Design Class Diagram) is N-A because no DCD exists. Every Fail becomes an action item. | No | Objective 6 |
 | 2 | Fix code review findings | Fix each Fail from RC-006 under `src/` and `tests/`, or record a justified deviation in the record. If the review has no Fail, close this task without a code change. | No | Objective 6 |
 | 3 | Add CI workflow | Add `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` that sets up Python 3.13, installs `.[dev]`, and runs `pytest`, `ruff check`, `ruff format --check` and `mypy` on push and pull request. Check first that the git host has an Actions runner. | No | Objective 6 |
 | 4 | Document CI in README | Add a short section to README.md saying what the CI runs and how to run the same checks locally. | No | Objective 4 |
 | 5 | Update traceability matrix | Add the RC-006 review to `docs/sqa/traceability-matrix.md` and close the milestone's row there. | No | Objective 6 |
 ---
 [BC-001]: ../business-case.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -4,12 +4,13 @@
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | PP-001 |
-| CrossReference | [BC-001], [SA-001], [MIL-001], [MIL-002], [MIL-003] |
+| CrossReference | [BC-001], [SA-001], [MIL-001], [MIL-002], [MIL-003], [MIL-004] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-05 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c0c3940] |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added MIL-004 Code Review and CI | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ published project, within the short assignment timeline in [BC-001].
 | Project Setup | [MIL-001] | 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-07 | S01 | none | Skeleton, tooling, README | [Milestone 40] |
 | Coffee Machine Core | [MIL-002] | 2026-10-08 to 2026-10-10 | 2026-10-10 | S01 | none | Working program | [Milestone 41] |
 | Quality and Publication | [MIL-003] | 2026-10-11 to 2026-10-12 | 2026-10-12 | S01 | none | Tests, Doxygen, published repo | [Milestone 42] |
 | Code Review and CI | [MIL-004] | 2026-10-07 to 2026-10-12 | 2026-10-12 | S01 | none | Source review record, CI workflow | |
 ```plantuml
@startgantt
@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ Project starts 2026-10-05
 [MIL-001 Go/No-Go] happens 2026-10-07
 [MIL-002 Go/No-Go] happens 2026-10-10
 [MIL-003 Go/No-Go] happens 2026-10-12
 [Code Review and CI] starts 2026-10-07 and ends 2026-10-12
 [MIL-004 Go/No-Go] happens 2026-10-12
@endgantt
 ```
@@ -53,11 +57,12 @@ Project starts 2026-10-05
 | `pyproject.toml`, `.gitignore`, `Doxyfile`, README | [MIL-001] |
 | Project documents | Planning, before [MIL-001] |
 | Repository description and topics | [MIL-003] |
 | Source code review record and CI workflow | [MIL-004] |
 ## Dependencies
 ```
-MIL-001 -> MIL-002 -> MIL-003
+MIL-001 -> MIL-002 -> MIL-003 -> MIL-004
 ```
 A No-Go moves all later dates by the same amount.
@@ -66,6 +71,7 @@ A No-Go moves all later dates by the same amount.
 | Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | The git host has no Actions runner | CI cannot run | Check the host first; if none, keep the workflow file and document the local commands |
 | README template not supplied | README task blocked | Ask S01 for the template before the task |
 | Doxygen not installed locally | Cannot verify docs | Document the install step in README |
@@ -82,7 +88,9 @@ A No-Go moves all later dates by the same amount.
 [MIL-001]: ./milestones/mil-001-project-setup.md
 [MIL-002]: ./milestones/mil-002-coffee-machine-core.md
 [MIL-003]: ./milestones/mil-003-quality-and-publication.md
 [MIL-004]: ./milestones/mil-004-code-review-and-ci.md
 [Milestone 40]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/milestone/40
 [Milestone 41]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/milestone/41
 [Milestone 42]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/milestone/42
 [c0c3940]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/c0c3940551db0d7d96492cc734976d0436051ff9
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
 # RC-001 Business Case Review
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | RC-001 |
 | CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Artifact Under Review
 - Instance reviewed: [BC-001] (docs/business-case.md)
 - Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] (`QC-BC-001`)
 - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
 ## Checklist Results
 | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit table is explicitly qualitative and says why (no money involved). |
 | 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Three risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
 | 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Five criteria with targets and a measure each. |
 | 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate. |
 | 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01 to S03 only; no roles are re-described. |
 | 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodology section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding conventions. |
 | 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Fixed in v2: the first draft had no duration, although MIL-001 to MIL-003 and PP-001 cite one. Constraints now state 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12. |
 | 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a reason. |
 ## Overall Verdict
 Go — all mandatory criteria pass. Criterion 7 first failed (missing duration constraint) and was fixed in the same change as BC-001 v2.
 ## Action Items
 | Action | Owner | Due |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | Add the duration constraint to BC-001 (done in v2) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
 ---
 [BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
 [QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-business-case.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
 # RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis Review
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | RC-002 |
 | CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Artifact Under Review
 - Instance reviewed: [SA-001] (docs/stakeholder-analysis.md)
 - Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] (`QC-SA-001`)
 - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
 ## Checklist Results
 | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01 to S03 each have power, interest and quadrant. |
 | 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are used by every other document. |
 | 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Levels are stated as High/Low in the table, with organisation and role. |
 | 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps each stakeholder to MIL-001 to MIL-003. |
 | 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | One conflict (assignment names vs testable structure) with a mitigation. |
 | 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table maps each stakeholder to [BC-001] objectives. |
 | 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a FURPS+ attribute. |
 | 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Plain language, short; each stakeholder can find their own row. |
 ## Overall Verdict
 Go — all criteria pass. The Sign-Off row said `Pending review` and was updated to the Go in SA-001 v2.
 ## Action Items
 | Action | Owner | Due |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | Record the sign-off in SA-001 (done in v2) | S01 | 2026-10-06 |
 ---
 [SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
 [QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
 # RC-003 MIL-001 Review
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | RC-003 |
 | CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-MIL-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Artifact Under Review
 - Instance reviewed: [MIL-001] (docs/milestones/mil-001-project-setup.md)
 - Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (`QC-MIL-001`)
 - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
 ## Checklist Results
 | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names the concrete output. |
 | 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go/No-Go table with one checkable criterion per row. |
 | 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table present. |
 | 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites the Business Case objectives. |
 | 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership names S01 as owner and approving reviewer (same person; see independence note). |
 | 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the duration constraint added to BC-001 in RC-001's action (2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12). Before that fix this was a Fail. |
 ## Overall Verdict
 Go — all criteria pass. Delivery matches: issues #1 to #5 closed, PRs 19 and 20 merged.
 ## Action Items
 | Action | Owner | Due |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | None | S01 | - |
 ---
 [MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-project-setup.md
 [QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
 # RC-004 MIL-002 Review
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | RC-004 |
 | CrossReference | [MIL-002], [QC-MIL-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Artifact Under Review
 - Instance reviewed: [MIL-002] (docs/milestones/mil-002-coffee-machine-core.md)
 - Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (`QC-MIL-001`)
 - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
 ## Checklist Results
 | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names the concrete output. |
 | 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go/No-Go table with one checkable criterion per row. |
 | 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table present. |
 | 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites the Business Case objectives. |
 | 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership names S01 as owner and approving reviewer (same person; see independence note). |
 | 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the duration constraint added to BC-001 in RC-001's action (2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12). Before that fix this was a Fail. |
 ## Overall Verdict
 Go — all criteria pass. Delivery matches: issues #6 to #12 closed, PR 21 merged. Note: Go/No-Go rows refer to the assignment's behaviour; the exact texts are asserted in tests/.
 ## Action Items
 | Action | Owner | Due |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | None | S01 | - |
 ---
 [MIL-002]: ../../milestones/mil-002-coffee-machine-core.md
 [QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
 # RC-005 MIL-003 Review
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | RC-005 |
 | CrossReference | [MIL-003], [QC-MIL-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Artifact Under Review
 - Instance reviewed: [MIL-003] (docs/milestones/mil-003-quality-and-publication.md)
 - Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (`QC-MIL-001`)
 - Independence: S01 is the only stakeholder and is also the recorded author, so the reviewer-is-not-author rule cannot be met. The documents were drafted by Claude on S01's behalf; S01 reviews and signs. This is a known limit of a one-person project, not a clean independent review.
 ## Checklist Results
 | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names the concrete output. |
 | 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go/No-Go table with one checkable criterion per row. |
 | 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table present. |
 | 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites the Business Case objectives. |
 | 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership names S01 as owner and approving reviewer (same person; see independence note). |
 | 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the duration constraint added to BC-001 in RC-001's action (2026-10-05 to 2026-10-12). Before that fix this was a Fail. |
 ## Overall Verdict
 Go — all criteria pass. Delivery matches: issues #13 to #17 closed, PR 22 merged.
 ## Action Items
 | Action | Owner | Due |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | None | S01 | - |
 ---
 [MIL-003]: ../../milestones/mil-003-quality-and-publication.md
 [QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-milestones-gateways.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 # Traceability Matrix
 ## Metadata
 | Key | Value |
 | --- | --- |
 | ID | TM-001 |
 | CrossReference | [BC-001] |
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [8ef00aa] |
 | 2026-10-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Added MIL-004 | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
 ## Purpose
 Tracks backward/forward links between artifact instances so that the Business Case's
 cross-artifact traceability can be measured. A row is added or updated whenever an
 artifact instance is created or reviewed.
 ## Traceability Table
 | Artifact Instance | Type | Upstream (Backward Link) | Downstream (Forward Link) | Last Reviewed (RC-ID) |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | [SA-001] | Stakeholder Analysis | - | [BC-001] | [RC-002] |
 | [BC-001] | Business Case | [SA-001] | [PP-001], [MIL-001], [MIL-002], [MIL-003], [MIL-004] | [RC-001] |
 | [PP-001] | Project Plan | [BC-001], [SA-001] | [MIL-001], [MIL-002], [MIL-003], [MIL-004] | - |
 | [MIL-001] | Milestone | [BC-001], [PP-001] | - | [RC-003] |
 | [MIL-002] | Milestone | [BC-001], [PP-001] | - | [RC-004] |
 | [MIL-003] | Milestone | [BC-001], [PP-001] | - | [RC-005] |
 | [MIL-004] | Milestone | [BC-001], [PP-001] | - | - |
 ## Coverage Notes
 - `-` in Upstream means foundational; in Downstream, nothing is built on it yet; in Last Reviewed, no `RC-*` exists yet.
 - [PP-001] has no QC checklist in the framework, so it has no `RC-*`.
 - No use case, domain model, design or data artifacts exist; the plan treats all tasks as plain technical tasks. The source code is covered by the tests, not by an `RC-*`.
 ---
 [SA-001]: ../stakeholder-analysis.md
 [BC-001]: ../business-case.md
 [PP-001]: ../project-plan.md
 [MIL-001]: ../milestones/mil-001-project-setup.md
 [MIL-002]: ../milestones/mil-002-coffee-machine-core.md
 [MIL-003]: ../milestones/mil-003-quality-and-publication.md
 [MIL-004]: ../milestones/mil-004-code-review-and-ci.md
 [RC-001]: ./reviews/rc-001-business-case.md
 [RC-002]: ./reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
 [RC-003]: ./reviews/rc-003-mil-001.md
 [RC-004]: ./reviews/rc-004-mil-002.md
 [RC-005]: ./reviews/rc-005-mil-003.md
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
 ## Version History
 | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| 2026-10-05 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c0c3940] |
+| 2026-10-05 | Deprecated | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | [c0c3940] |
 | 2026-10-06 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Recorded S01 sign-off after RC-002 | [8ef00aa] |
 ---
@@ -70,9 +71,10 @@ Monitor).
 | Stakeholder | Decision | Date |
 | --- | --- | --- |
-| S01 | Pending review | |
+| S01 | Go (RC-002) | 2026-10-06 |
 ---
 [BC-001]: ./business-case.md
 [c0c3940]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/c0c3940551db0d7d96492cc734976d0436051ff9
 [8ef00aa]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100_days_of_code/015-coffee_machine/commit/8ef00aafaaa193ea565f1a45238d31e963a5e05d