Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Tirsvad 69021844af Sign review records RC-001 to RC-009 as accepted
CI / checks (push) Successful in 50s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 50s
S01 accepts the nine SQA review records. The one-person independence
limit stays recorded in each record.
No issue closed: documentation status only, no code changed.
2026-10-06 22:05:23 +08:00
TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 865ca9cd35 Resolve pending commit links in the RC-009 change
CI / checks (push) Successful in 50s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 21:55:34 +08:00
Tirsvad 52b972520d Review the Project Plan (RC-009) and accept v3
CI / checks (push) Successful in 53s
Add RC-009 for the Project Plan against criteria taken from the Project
Plan reference, since the framework has no QC checklist for it. Five
defects found: wrong phase count, wrong delivery assumption, an
overlapping MIL-003/MIL-004 schedule, and a stale risk and open issues.
PP-001 v3 fixes them and is accepted; v2 is deprecated. The
traceability matrix now points to RC-009.

No issue closed: review and documentation only, no code changed.
2026-10-06 21:55:08 +08:00
TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 2b65618c1a Resolve pending commit links in the RC-008 change
CI / checks (push) Successful in 52s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 54s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 21:46:06 +08:00
Tirsvad 861edbfa92 Re-review the Business Case and accept v4
CI / checks (push) Successful in 56s
Add RC-008 for the Business Case after v3 added objective 6. Two
defects found: objective 6 had no success criterion, and the Python
version was worded differently in the assumption and the constraint.
BC-001 v4 fixes both and is accepted; v3 is deprecated. The
traceability matrix now points to RC-008.
No issue closed: review and documentation only, no code changed.
2026-10-06 21:44:11 +08:00
TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 f192f227e2 Resolve pending commit links in MIL-004 review records
CI / checks (push) Successful in 51s
CI / checks (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:56:18 +08:00
Tirsvad 00d47e244c Review source code and add CI for MIL-004
CI / checks (push) Successful in 1m5s
Add RC-006 (source code against QC-PY-001) and RC-007 (MIL-004), and
update the traceability matrix. Set lower bounds for the dev
dependencies, the one optional Fail in RC-006. Add a Gitea Actions
workflow running pytest, ruff and mypy, and describe it in the README.
Accept MIL-004 and link its Milestone in the Project Plan.

Closes #24
Closes #25
Closes #26
Closes #27
Closes #28

Task: MIL-004#1
Task: MIL-004#2
Task: MIL-004#3
Task: MIL-004#4
Task: MIL-004#5
2026-10-06 20:50:41 +08:00
TirsvadandClaude Sonnet 5.5 2b9e46b81f Resolve pending commit links in review and planning documents
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:43:23 +08:00
Tirsvad 8ef00aafaa Add SQA review records and plan MIL-004 Code Review and CI
Add RC-001 to RC-005 for the Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis and
MIL-001 to MIL-003, checked against their QC checklists, and a
traceability matrix. The reviews found a missing duration constraint in
the Business Case; BC-001 v2 adds it, and SA-001 v2 records the
sign-off. Register RC and TM in the artifact registry.

Plan MIL-004 (review the source against QC-PY-001, add a CI workflow)
as Proposed, with Business Case objective 6, a Project Plan gateway
row and a matrix entry. The milestone is not yet synced to the git host.

No issue closed: planning and review documents only, no code changed.
2026-10-06 20:42:51 +08:00