TirSystem/github-action: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Skipped
Validate workflows / validate (pull_request) Successful in 31s
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
Review Record: MIL-011 task 1 results (delta)
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-077 |
| CrossReference | MIL-011, RC-076, QC-MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version; accepted | eaa0e30 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-011, the Version History row and the section "Verification results" added in project pull request 177 (the results of task 1)
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 (criteria 1, 2 and 4 re-scored; 3, 5 and 6 not affected)
- Scope: delta re-review, reason: the milestone changed in content after RC-076
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the user chose autonomous mode in chat on 2026-10-14 and the accepted plan is MIL-011)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | ## Deliverable is unchanged and task 1 has its record: the results name the run (1499, job 1638), the commits and the five workflows. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Criterion 1 ("reproduced and recorded") and criterion 2 ("all five checked and listed") are met by the section; the evidence was read from the run's log (bash: shared-scripts/tools/code-metrics.sh: No such file or directory, exit code 127) and from git cat-file per tag. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | N-A | Not affected. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Unchanged (O5). |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | N-A | Not affected. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | N-A | Not affected (2026-10-23). |
Overall Verdict
Go - the results are true to the evidence: the failure at @v2 is in the log of job 1638, and the absence of a run at @v1 was observed on two pushes (5654905, 46e752d) against a run for the @v2 call alone (9a17868). The finding that the other four workflows resolve but follow the older major is stated as a question for task 2, not as a defect. The AI accepts the row as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | - | - |