# Review Record: MIL-011 task 1 results (delta)

## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-077 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-011], [RC-076], [QC-MIL-001] |

## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version; accepted | [eaa0e30] |

---

## Artifact Under Review

- Instance reviewed: [MIL-011], the Version History row and the section "Verification results" added in project pull request 177 (the results of task 1)
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] (criteria 1, 2 and 4 re-scored; 3, 5 and 6 not affected)
- Scope: delta re-review, reason: the milestone changed in content after [RC-076]
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the user chose autonomous mode in chat on 2026-10-14 and the accepted plan is [MIL-011])

## Checklist Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | `## Deliverable` is unchanged and task 1 has its record: the results name the run (1499, job 1638), the commits and the five workflows. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Criterion 1 ("reproduced and recorded") and criterion 2 ("all five checked and listed") are met by the section; the evidence was read from the run's log (`bash: shared-scripts/tools/code-metrics.sh: No such file or directory`, exit code 127) and from `git cat-file` per tag. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | N-A | Not affected. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Unchanged (O5). |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | N-A | Not affected. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | N-A | Not affected (2026-10-23). |

## Overall Verdict

Go - the results are true to the evidence: the failure at `@v2` is in the log of job 1638, and the absence of a run at `@v1` was observed on two pushes (`5654905`, `46e752d`) against a run for the `@v2` call alone (`9a17868`). The finding that the other four workflows resolve but follow the older major is stated as a question for task 2, not as a defect. The AI accepts the row as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

## Action Items

| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | - | - |

---

[MIL-011]: ../../milestones/mil-011-code-metrics-default-tools-ref.md
[RC-076]: ./rc-076-mil-011-plan.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[eaa0e30]: https://git.tirsystem.com/TirSystem/github-action/commit/eaa0e30beaa097dfeb1c07c814a71d02a6987060