Files
github-action/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-077-mil-011-task-1-results.md
T
Tirsvad 604d4c2d0c
TirSystem/github-action: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Skipped
Validate workflows / validate (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Resolve pending commit links for MIL-011
2026-10-14 17:13:23 +08:00

2.8 KiB

Review Record: MIL-011 task 1 results (delta)

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-077
CrossReference MIL-011, RC-076, QC-MIL-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-14 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen AI as stand-in for S01 Initial version; accepted eaa0e30

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: MIL-011, the Version History row and the section "Verification results" added in project pull request 177 (the results of task 1)
  • Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 (criteria 1, 2 and 4 re-scored; 3, 5 and 6 not affected)
  • Scope: delta re-review, reason: the milestone changed in content after RC-076
  • Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the user chose autonomous mode in chat on 2026-10-14 and the accepted plan is MIL-011)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate Pass ## Deliverable is unchanged and task 1 has its record: the results name the run (1499, job 1638), the commits and the five workflows.
2 Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate Pass Criterion 1 ("reproduced and recorded") and criterion 2 ("all five checked and listed") are met by the section; the evidence was read from the run's log (bash: shared-scripts/tools/code-metrics.sh: No such file or directory, exit code 127) and from git cat-file per tag.
3 Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped N-A Not affected.
4 Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI Pass Unchanged (O5).
5 Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified N-A Not affected.
6 Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints N-A Not affected (2026-10-23).

Overall Verdict

Go - the results are true to the evidence: the failure at @v2 is in the log of job 1638, and the absence of a run at @v1 was observed on two pushes (5654905, 46e752d) against a run for the @v2 call alone (9a17868). The finding that the other four workflows resolve but follow the older major is stated as a question for task 2, not as a defect. The AI accepts the row as stand-in for S01; there is no independent reader and the decision stays open to challenge in the run summary.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None - -