Accept BC, SA, PP and MIL-001 after review

Review BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 and record the results as RC-001 to RC-004. All four verdicts are Go, so their Version History rows become Accepted and the previous rows Deprecated. MIL-002 to MIL-004 stay Proposed. BC-001 failed criterion 1 (cost-benefit not justified as qualitative). Add the justification and a target-completion constraint (2026-10-14) that PP-001 and MIL-001 are checked against. Add the Traceability Matrix (TM-001) and register RC and TM in the artifact registry. PP has no QC checklist, so RC-003 checks the plan against BC-001 and the milestones instead. Author and reviewer are both S01, a deviation noted in each record. Refs #5
2026-10-04 23:23:12 +08:00
parent cb28865787
commit a1ff73580f
10 changed files with 349 additions and 103 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# SQA Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis
+
+## Metadata
+| Key | Value |
+| --- | --- |
+| ID | RC-002 |
+| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
+
+## Version History
+| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 2026-10-04 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | S01 | Initial version | pending |
+
+---
+
+## Artifact Under Review
+
+- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
+- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
+
+## Checklist Results
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder | Pass | S01–S03 all classified. |
+| 2 | Each stakeholder has a unique, stable ID | Pass | S01, S02, S03. |
+| 3 | Roles and organizational context defined with explicit Power and Interest levels | Pass | Summary table. |
+| 4 | Communication needs mapped to phases or milestones (Optional) | Pass | Communication Requirements table cites MIL-001 to MIL-004. |
+| 5 | Conflicting interests identified with mitigation | Pass | One conflict (tooling versus simple repository), mitigated. |
+| 6 | Stakeholder concerns traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table cites O1–O5. |
+| 7 | Concerns expressed in business language and FURPS+ (Optional) | Pass | FURPS+ mapping table. |
+| 8 | Understandable by non-technical stakeholders (Optional) | Pass | Plain language, short document. |
+
+## Overall Verdict
+
+Go — all criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).
+
+## Action Items
+
+| Action | Owner | Due |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| None | — | — |
+
+---
+
+[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
+[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md