Files
014-higher_lower/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
T
Tirsvad a1ff73580f Accept BC, SA, PP and MIL-001 after review
Review BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 and record the results as
RC-001 to RC-004. All four verdicts are Go, so their Version History
rows become Accepted and the previous rows Deprecated. MIL-002 to
MIL-004 stay Proposed.

BC-001 failed criterion 1 (cost-benefit not justified as qualitative).
Add the justification and a target-completion constraint (2026-10-14)
that PP-001 and MIL-001 are checked against.

Add the Traceability Matrix (TM-001) and register RC and TM in the
artifact registry. PP has no QC checklist, so RC-003 checks the plan
against BC-001 and the milestones instead. Author and reviewer are
both S01, a deviation noted in each record.

Refs #5
2026-10-04 23:23:12 +08:00

1.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

SQA Review Record: Stakeholder Analysis

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-002
CrossReference SA-001, QC-SA-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-04 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen S01 Initial version pending

Artifact Under Review

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder Pass S01–S03 all classified.
2 Each stakeholder has a unique, stable ID Pass S01, S02, S03.
3 Roles and organizational context defined with explicit Power and Interest levels Pass Summary table.
4 Communication needs mapped to phases or milestones (Optional) Pass Communication Requirements table cites MIL-001 to MIL-004.
5 Conflicting interests identified with mitigation Pass One conflict (tooling versus simple repository), mitigated.
6 Stakeholder concerns traced to Business Case objectives Pass Business Goal Alignment table cites O1–O5.
7 Concerns expressed in business language and FURPS+ (Optional) Pass FURPS+ mapping table.
8 Understandable by non-technical stakeholders (Optional) Pass Plain language, short document.

Overall Verdict

Go — all criteria pass. Reviewer and author are both S01: the project has a single participant, so the framework's author/reviewer separation cannot be met. S01 accepted this deviation when requesting acceptance (2026-10-04).

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None — —