055-higher-lower/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-003-project-plan.md

RC-003 review

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-003
CrossReference	PP-001, QC-PP-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-11-06	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	fe0f272

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: PP-001
• Checklist used: QC-PP-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none, the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The plan states its start date, end date and the constraint it must fit	Pass	Start 2026-11-06, end 2026-11-16, fits the Duration constraint of BC-001
2	Every milestone or gateway is listed once with its document, decision date and owner	Pass	Four gateways, each once, with document, decision date and owner S01
3	Every decision date lies inside the plan's window and is consistent with the dates in the linked MIL-* document	Pass	Decision dates 11-08, 11-10, 11-12, 11-16 equal the MIL target dates and lie in the window
4	Every in-scope item of the Business Case is delivered at a named gateway (scope coverage)	Pass	Scope Coverage maps every In Scope item to MIL-001 to MIL-004
5	Dependencies between gateways are stated, acyclic and consistent with the schedule order	Pass	Chain MIL-001 → MIL-002 → MIL-003 → MIL-004 is acyclic and matches the dates
6	The plan states what happens to later gateways and to the end date when a gateway is No-Go	Pass	Dependencies section: a No-Go moves later dates and the end date; S01 decides
7	Owners, reviewers and escalation roles use Stakeholder Analysis IDs and match the governance RACI	Pass	Owner S01 only; no GOV exists in this project, so there is no RACI to cross-check
8	Planning assumptions are listed with their source, and a changed baseline is recorded with its reason	Pass	Assumptions list their source, including the planner's date estimate accepted by S01
9	Plan risks are listed with impact and a mitigation, and trace to Business Case risks where they come from there	Pass	Two plan risks with impact, mitigation and the BC-001 risk they come from
10	Open issues are listed, and none contradicts a statement elsewhere in the plan	Pass	Open issues are current: repository URL, no use cases, wiki location; none contradicts the plan
11	Each gateway's main deliverable is stated and matches the deliverable of its MIL-* document	Pass	Each deliverable matches its MIL Deliverable section in substance
12	Gateways that deliver user stories name them, and those that do not say why	Pass	Stories column says "none (technical tasks)"
13	The schedule view (table, Gantt) and the dependency view agree with each other	Pass	Gantt bars and table dates agree; the chain matches the dependency list
14	Each gateway is linked to its issue-tracker milestone, or marked as not yet synced	Pass	Milestone column blank and stated as not yet synced
15	The plan is a singleton: one Project Plan per project, changes recorded in Version History	Pass	One Project Plan, PP-001, with a Version History

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Metadata has `Language
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	PP-001 prose and table cells are in English
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register is IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL, IT Professional English for SA, as the registry gives
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Only standard IT terms are used (Flask, route, decorator, test); the project has no DICT and no PO-specific term needs one
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No .en.md/.da.md twin exists beside the document
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	No change of language or domain; this is the first version
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	AI as stand-in for S01 read the terms as correct IT usage; S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-11-06. Stand-in decision, not independent; open to challenge in the run summary
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations (BC, SA, MIL, GIF, HTML, PR) are spelled out or are standard IT abbreviations

Overall Verdict

Go — All Mandatory criteria pass after the plan was corrected before review (No-Go effect, risk traceability, stories reason); no blocking finding.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	2026-11-06

---