054-speed-calc-decorator/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-006-adr-0001.md

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-006
CrossReference	ADR-0001, QC-ADR-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-11-06	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version: review of ADR-0001, two rounds	a07d05b

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: ADR-0001
• Checklist used: QC-ADR-001 (a technical type: no QC-LANG-001 table)
• Scope: full review. Round 1 found two defects (criterion 10 and the shared rationale for criterion 4); they were fixed in the ADR and the criteria re-checked in round 2, which this record shows.
• Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
• Language reviewer: none
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; S01 is also the author and Product Owner)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The ID (ADR-NNNN, 4-digit) matches the filename number and is unique and sequential	Pass	ID ADR-0001, file adr-0001-...; the only ADR; registry next version is 0002
2	Context states the problem, the forces (cost, risk, constraints) and the options evaluated	Pass	Problem: stories/use cases and code layout for a one-function exercise; Forces paragraph (date 2026-11-09, S02 and S03 wants, layers hiding the three functions); options (a) and (b) for both decisions
3	At least two options were considered, or the absence of alternatives is justified	Pass	Two options for each of the two decisions
4	Decision is stated in one or two unhedged sentences and matches one of the evaluated options	Pass	Two sentences, no hedging; they match option (b) of each decision. Round 1: two decisions share one driver (proportion to the exercise), now stated in Context, so they are not unrelated
5	Consequences list both Positive and Negative outcomes	Pass	Both lists present; negatives: does not scale, no story-level traceability
6	Quality-attribute impacts (performance, security, portability, etc.) are named where the decision affects them	Pass	Maintainability/scalability limit named as negative; no runtime dependencies named as positive; performance and security are not affected
7	Affected Artifacts are listed as links, and each is also in CrossReference	Pass	BC-001 and PP-001 are linked and both in CrossReference; PP-001 "Stories" column does say "none" and point to ADR-0001
8	Status changes are recorded as new Version History rows with a Change summary and Commit link; retained rows are never rewritten	Pass	Acceptance is a new row, the earlier row only moves to Deprecated as the RC process says; Commit is pending until the commit exists (resolved by resolve-pending-commits.sh)
9	A superseded or deprecated ADR names its successor, and the successor links back	N-A	ADR-0001 is not superseded; the Deprecated row is a version row, not the ADR
10	Written in business or technical language of the domain, with no unexplained abbreviations	Pass	Round 1 Fail: S01 to S03 were bare IDs. Fixed: S01, S02 and S03 are now glossed in Context
11	Status is one of Proposed, Accepted, Rejected, Deprecated or Superseded by ADR-NNNN, and every Version History row uses only these	Pass	Rows use Deprecated and Accepted only

Overall Verdict

Go. Every Mandatory criterion passes after the two round 1 fixes; criterion 9 is N-A with a reason. Not independent: the author and the stand-in reviewer are the same party.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Resolve the pending commit links after the commit	S01	2026-11-09

---