054-speed-calc-decorator/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-003-mil-001-project-baseline.md

RC-003 Review of MIL-001 Project baseline and repository

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-003
CrossReference	MIL-001, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-11-06	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	a07d05b

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: MIL-001
• Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and QC-LANG-001 (the type is written in the PO language)
• Scope: full review. Round 1 found the defects named under Overall Verdict; they were fixed in the document and the criteria re-checked in round 2, which this record shows.
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: S01 (a person; confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-11-06)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; S01 is also the author, the Product Owner and the named reviewer)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate	Pass	"Deliverable": pyproject.toml, Python .gitignore, Doxyfile, README, ADR-0001, repository description and topics
2	Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate	Pass	Six criteria, each checkable by a command or an API call. Round 1 defect (fixed): the deliverable ADR-0001 had no criterion; criterion 6 added
3	Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped	Pass	"Dependencies": none, first gateway; matches PP-001
4	Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI	Pass	Objectives 3 and 5; round 1 added success criteria 3 and 6, which Go criteria 1 and 5 verify
5	Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified	Pass	Owner S01, approving reviewer S01. Note: the same person, so not independent; the project has no governance document that requires otherwise
6	Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints	Pass	2026-11-06, before the BC-001 target 2026-11-09; equals the decision date in PP-001

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Metadata has Language = en and Domain = it
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the domain table of docs/artifact-registry.md
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. The English wording is correct
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	IT Executive English: purpose and target date read at a glance; Go/No-Go criteria are necessarily concrete (files, commands) so that they are checkable
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. No DICT exists; the PO confirmed the terms are correct
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	All keys, headings and statuses are the framework's English ones
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	The docs/ listing has no twin file
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	N-A	No earlier accepted version exists and the language has been en since the first row
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. S01 reads English and knows software and IT; the IT domain terms are used correctly
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Round 1: API and ADR were not expanded; expanded on first use in the Go criteria and the task

Overall Verdict

Go. No Fail on QC-MIL-001 in round 2. Round 1 found one defect (criterion 2: deliverable ADR-0001 without a Go criterion; plus thin traceability for criterion 4) and QC-LANG-001 criterion 10 (API and ADR unexpanded), all fixed. ADR-0001 is a task of this milestone; it is now written and accepted (RC-006). Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were Pending and are now Pass: S01 (a person) confirmed the English wording and the IT domain terms in chat on 2026-11-06. All Mandatory rows pass, so the verdict is Go and the Version History row of the document is Accepted. The review remains Mode: autonomous, not independent for the rest. Finding: no governance document defines escalation; S01 is owner and reviewer.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
Confirm criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 as a person (Closed: confirmed by S01 in chat, 2026-11-06; criteria set to Pass, verdict Go, document row Accepted)	S01	2026-11-06

---