# RC-003 Review of MIL-001 Project baseline and repository ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-003 | | CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-11-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [a07d05b] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [MIL-001] - Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and [QC-LANG-001] (the type is written in the PO language) - Scope: full review. Round 1 found the defects named under Overall Verdict; they were fixed in the document and the criteria re-checked in round 2, which this record shows. - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: S01 (a person; confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-11-06) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; S01 is also the author, the Product Owner and the named reviewer) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | "Deliverable": pyproject.toml, Python .gitignore, Doxyfile, README, ADR-0001, repository description and topics | | 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Six criteria, each checkable by a command or an API call. Round 1 defect (fixed): the deliverable ADR-0001 had no criterion; criterion 6 added | | 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | "Dependencies": none, first gateway; matches PP-001 | | 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Objectives 3 and 5; round 1 added success criteria 3 and 6, which Go criteria 1 and 5 verify | | 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner S01, approving reviewer S01. Note: the same person, so not independent; the project has no governance document that requires otherwise | | 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | 2026-11-06, before the BC-001 target 2026-11-09; equals the decision date in PP-001 | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language` = `en` and `Domain` = `it` | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the domain table of `docs/artifact-registry.md` | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. The English wording is correct | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | IT Executive English: purpose and target date read at a glance; Go/No-Go criteria are necessarily concrete (files, commands) so that they are checkable | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. No DICT exists; the PO confirmed the terms are correct | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | All keys, headings and statuses are the framework's English ones | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | The `docs/` listing has no twin file | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | No earlier accepted version exists and the language has been `en` since the first row | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by S01 (a person) in chat, 2026-11-06. S01 reads English and knows software and IT; the IT domain terms are used correctly | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Round 1: API and ADR were not expanded; expanded on first use in the Go criteria and the task | ## Overall Verdict Go. No Fail on QC-MIL-001 in round 2. Round 1 found one defect (criterion 2: deliverable ADR-0001 without a Go criterion; plus thin traceability for criterion 4) and QC-LANG-001 criterion 10 (API and ADR unexpanded), all fixed. ADR-0001 is a task of this milestone; it is now written and accepted (RC-006). Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were Pending and are now Pass: S01 (a person) confirmed the English wording and the IT domain terms in chat on 2026-11-06. All Mandatory rows pass, so the verdict is Go and the Version History row of the document is Accepted. The review remains `Mode: autonomous, not independent` for the rest. Finding: no governance document defines escalation; S01 is owner and reviewer. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | Confirm criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 as a person (Closed: confirmed by S01 in chat, 2026-11-06; criteria set to Pass, verdict Go, document row Accepted) | S01 | 2026-11-06 | --- [MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-project-baseline.md [QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [a07d05b]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/054-speed-calc-decorator/commit/a07d05b385e6b831b90731aefe08f078ebb951ca