Files
054-flask/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
Tirsvad e16ef62148
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/git-workflows: Release / release (pull_request) Successful in 19s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (pull_request) Successful in 32s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Successful in 16s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish accepted milestones / publish (push) Successful in 52s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (push) Successful in 33s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (push) Successful in 4m38s
Resolve pending commit links
2026-11-06 12:06:06 +08:00

70 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown

# Review of SA-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-11-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [73a5a95] |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02, S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | Stable IDs S01-S03. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organisation, power and interest are explicit. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | CM-001 to CM-004 tie channels to milestones. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts with mitigations. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table cites BC-001 objectives. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concerns are in business language with a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain tables. |
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | CN-001 to CN-007, each names its stakeholder. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English, the PO language (registry `PO language` = en). |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English for BC/PP/MIL, IT Professional English for SA/DICT; no implementation detail in the executive documents beyond file names. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms follow `docs/dictionary.md` (DICT-001): greeting, home page, lecture step, local environment, wrapper. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no earlier language to compare. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Reviewer S01 reads English and works in the IT domain (stand-in, not independent). |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | FURPS+, BC, SA etc. are defined by the framework; ISO/IEC 25010 named in full. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — All criteria pass.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | - |
---
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
[73a5a95]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/054-flask/commit/73a5a95d28db041e4f27342cc552e18f7d386410