Tirsvad
e16ef62148
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish wiki / publish-wiki (push) Skipped
TirSystem/git-workflows: Release / release (pull_request) Successful in 19s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (pull_request) Successful in 32s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (pull_request) Successful in 2m27s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Sync GitHub mirror metadata / sync-metadata (push) Successful in 16s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Publish accepted milestones / publish (push) Successful in 52s
TirSystem/git-workflows: Validate / validate (push) Successful in 33s
TirSystem/git-workflows: OpenGrep / opengrep (push) Successful in 4m38s
69 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
# Review of BC-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-001 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-11-06 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [73a5a95] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit Assessment is qualitative and says why (no revenue, no cash cost; only the author's time). |
|
|
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Four risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
|
|
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria table: six criteria with numeric or countable targets and a measure. |
|
|
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has In Scope and Out of Scope subsections. |
|
|
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 from SA-001; roles are not re-described. |
|
|
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodology section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding skills. |
|
|
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate bullet lists. |
|
|
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation: Proceed, one sentence. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English, the PO language (registry `PO language` = en). |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English for BC/PP/MIL, IT Professional English for SA/DICT; no implementation detail in the executive documents beyond file names. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms follow `docs/dictionary.md` (DICT-001): greeting, home page, lecture step, local environment, wrapper. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Checked against the document and the registry. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `*.en.md` or other translated twin exists. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no earlier language to compare. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Reviewer S01 reads English and works in the IT domain (stand-in, not independent). |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | FURPS+, BC, SA etc. are defined by the framework; ISO/IEC 25010 named in full. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — All mandatory criteria pass; the document is accepted as the baseline.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | S01 | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
|
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
|
[73a5a95]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/054-flask/commit/73a5a95d28db041e4f27342cc552e18f7d386410
|