054-flask/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-business-case.md

Review of BC-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-11-06	Proposed	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	73a5a95

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: QC-BC-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost-Benefit Assessment is qualitative and says why (no revenue, no cash cost; only the author's time).
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Four risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Success Criteria table: six criteria with numeric or countable targets and a measure.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	Scope has In Scope and Out of Scope subsections.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 from SA-001; roles are not re-described.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodology section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding skills.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Assumptions and Constraints are separate bullet lists.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation: Proceed, one sentence.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English, the PO language (registry PO language = en).
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register: IT Executive English for BC/PP/MIL, IT Professional English for SA/DICT; no implementation detail in the executive documents beyond file names.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Terms follow docs/dictionary.md (DICT-001): greeting, home page, lecture step, local environment, wrapper.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Checked against the document and the registry.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No *.en.md or other translated twin exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version; no earlier language to compare.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	Reviewer S01 reads English and works in the IT domain (stand-in, not independent).
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	FURPS+, BC, SA etc. are defined by the framework; ISO/IEC 25010 named in full.

Overall Verdict

Go — All mandatory criteria pass; the document is accepted as the baseline.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---