68 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-004 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [DICT-001], [QC-DICT-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S02 | Review record, full review | [50e8331] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [DICT-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-DICT-001] (`QC-DICT-001`)
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S02`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Every row has a PO term, its language, an IT term and a definition | Pass | Every row has a PO term, language, IT term, definition and where it is used. |
|
|
| 2 | Each PO term maps to exactly one IT term and the reverse (no synonyms) | Pass | Eight PO terms map to eight different IT terms; no synonyms. |
|
|
| 3 | Every Domain Model concept has a row, and the Domain Model uses its PO term | N-A | No Domain Model exists (ADR-0001). |
|
|
| 4 | The Operation Contracts, Sequence Diagrams, Design Class Diagrams and ERD use the IT term, not the PO term | N-A | No Operation Contract, Sequence Diagram, DCD or ERD exists (ADR-0001). |
|
|
| 5 | Definitions are written in the PO language and are one sentence | Pass | Each definition is one English sentence. |
|
|
| 6 | "Used as PO term in" and "Used as IT term in" name artifact types that exist in the project | Pass | Used-in columns name BC, SA and MIL, which exist. |
|
|
| 7 | The dictionary's `Language` and `Domain` rows, and the language of every row, match the PO language and domain in the project registry | Pass | Dictionary Language = en and Domain = it match the registry. |
|
|
| 8 | The dictionary rows are in ascending order of the PO term (case-insensitive, by the alphabet of the PO language) | Pass | Rows run Booking, Bot, Class card, Lecture step, Profile, Retry, Time travel, Waitlist: ascending. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language` = en and `Domain` = it. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of DICT-001 are English (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register of the type is given in the registry (Languages); the text keeps to it. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms follow DICT-001: all eight terms of the dictionary itself (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists in `docs/`. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no language change. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reviewer reads English and checked the IT terms in context (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out or defined where first used, or are the framework's own IDs. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — DICT-001 meets every Mandatory criterion. No blocking finding. The review is not independent: the AI authored and reviewed it as stand-in for S02, and S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary. Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were assessed by the stand-in only; the framework would hold them `Pending` for an independent language reviewer. S01 is asked to confirm them in the end-of-run summary.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | S01 | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[DICT-001]: ../../dictionary.md
|
|
[QC-DICT-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-dictionary.md
|
|
[50e8331]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/049-snack-and-lift/commit/50e8331bd21910a72ae56b74c9ff6a3677a709b3
|