4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-008 |
| CrossReference | MIL-001, QC-MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S02 | Review record, full review | 50e8331 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-001
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 (
QC-MIL-001) - Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S02)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete files, runs or documents. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go/No-Go table has objectively checkable criteria with Go and No-Go columns. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names the preceding milestone and the reason. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites O7 of BC-001 and the concerns of SA-001. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership names S01 as owner and S02 (AI as stand-in) as approving reviewer. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date lies inside the window 2026-10-28 to 2026-11-06 of PP-001. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has Language = en and Domain = it. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-001 are English (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register of the type is given in the registry (Languages); the text keeps to it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms follow DICT-001: bot, booking, lecture step (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists in docs/. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no language change. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reviewer reads English and checked the IT terms in context (stand-in assessment, see the verdict). |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out or defined where first used, or are the framework's own IDs. |
Overall Verdict
Go — MIL-001 meets every Mandatory criterion. No blocking finding. The review is not independent: the AI authored and reviewed it as stand-in for S02, and S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary. Criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 were assessed by the stand-in only; the framework would hold them Pending for an independent language reviewer. S01 is asked to confirm them in the end-of-run summary. Tasks: tasks 1 to 7 cover reviews, ADRs, dictionary, matrix, metadata, prompt log and hook.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |