Tirsvad
375cc0b5f3
The game updates the price and owned text at once but the affordable flag only at its next redraw, so a second purchase in the same visit used a stale flag. Buying at most one product per visit cut the failed purchases from about 40 percent to 1 of 49 and raised the CPS from 16.6 to 29 in the 300 second Docker run. README, screenshots and the wiki in en, da and ms show the new result. Task: MIL-006#1 Task: MIL-006#2 Task: MIL-006#3 Task: MIL-006#4 Task: MIL-006#5
3.8 KiB
3.8 KiB
SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-014 |
| CrossReference | MIL-006, QC-MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | 638730d |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-006
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable names the changed functions, a Docker run with CPS and log, and the updated README and wiki. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Five checkable Go criteria (failure rate below 5 percent, CPS above 16.6, checks green, review Go, same result in all docs). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Depends on MIL-005. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traces to O1, O3 and O4 of the Business Case. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | S01 owner and approving reviewer. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target 2026-11-03 is inside the window and equals the Project Plan decision date. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has Language en and Domain it. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer). Content is English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer). Ordinary IT terms; no dictionary exists or is needed. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | No change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer). S01 is competent in English and in IT. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out at first use. |
Overall Verdict
Go - All Mandatory criteria pass; the language criteria were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |