69 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-001 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [96a9a78] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
|
|
- Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit section is qualitative and says why: a learning project with no revenue and no budget. |
|
|
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Risks table has five risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
|
|
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria table has seven rows with numeric or checkable targets (300 seconds, exit code 0, exactly one dependency). |
|
|
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has separate In Scope and Out of Scope subsections. |
|
|
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and links [SA-001]; no role is re-described. |
|
|
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Clean Architecture and the Docker GUI rule. |
|
|
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
|
|
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is a single word: Proceed. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has Language en and Domain it. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no earlier accepted version. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | S01 | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
|
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
|
[96a9a78]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/048-the-coockie-factory/commit/96a9a78f010ce8ae3fce8d84602317d8b5808a13
|