048-the-coockie-factory/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-business-case.md

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, QC-BC-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-28	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	96a9a78

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: QC-BC-001 and QC-LANG-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
• Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost-Benefit section is qualitative and says why: a learning project with no revenue and no budget.
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Risks table has five risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Success Criteria table has seven rows with numeric or checkable targets (300 seconds, exit code 0, exactly one dependency).
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	Scope has separate In Scope and Out of Scope subsections.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and links [SA-001]; no role is re-described.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023, Clean Architecture and the Docker GUI rule.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation is a single word: Proceed.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Metadata has Language en and Domain it.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register: IT Executive English.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	N-A	First version; no earlier accepted version.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use.

Overall Verdict

Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---