3.9 KiB
3.9 KiB
SQA Review Record
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-008 |
| CrossReference | MIL-005, QC-MIL-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | 96a9a78 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-005
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5 and 9 of QC-LANG-001 in chat on 2026-10-28)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the language criteria were confirmed by S01 in person)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete files and outputs. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table lists checkable criteria (commands, files, counts). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table is filled. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability maps to Business Case objectives. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership names S01 as owner and approving reviewer. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date lies inside the one-week limit and equals the Project Plan decision date. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has Language en and Domain it. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (named human reviewer); content is English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register: IT Executive English. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28: terms are ordinary IT terms and no dictionary exists or is needed. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Headings, keys, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version; no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | S01, competent in English and in IT, confirmed the domain terms in chat on 2026-10-28. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (CPS, GUI, FURPS+, ADR) are spelled out at first use. |
Overall Verdict
Go - no Mandatory criterion failed and none is Pending; the language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01. Stand-in review, not independent.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |