70 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
# RC-002 Review of SA-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-002 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Claude (AI) | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version: Go | [b344b6e] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads the language and knows the domain; the stand-in applies S01's role)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | All three stakeholders have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
|
|
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and stable. |
|
|
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Roles, organisation, Power and Interest are in the table, not only in narrative. |
|
|
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps each stakeholder to channel, frequency, deliverable and milestone. |
|
|
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation. |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Business Goal Alignment table traces each concern to Business Case objectives. |
|
|
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Concern register maps every concern to a FURPS+ attribute. |
|
|
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short, plain table and prose; each stakeholder can find their entry. |
|
|
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | Concerns CN-001 to CN-007 have stable IDs and name the stakeholder. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; quoted file names and code stay as they are. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Professional English. as the registry says for this type. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No domain dictionary exists yet, so no PO term can contradict one; the IT terms used (Selenium, CSS selector, Docker, headless, driver) are standard and used with one word per concept. Stand-in judgement, open to challenge. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin file exists beside the document. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; language and domain have not changed. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by `AI as stand-in for S01` (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain, as the registry states). Not independent; open to challenge in the end-of-run summary. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations used (CSS, API, PNG, FURPS+, e2e) are spelled out on first use where they appear. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — Every Mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes; no Fail. Stand-in review as `AI as stand-in for S01`, not independent: S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | S01 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
|
|
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
|
[b344b6e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/048-scrapping-wiki/commit/b344b6e2cba397e23714c73a45ad4155bb1e00e0
|