69 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
# RC-001 Review of BC-001
|
||
|
||
## Metadata
|
||
| Key | Value |
|
||
| --- | --- |
|
||
| ID | RC-001 |
|
||
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Claude (AI) | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version: Go | [b344b6e] |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Artifact Under Review
|
||
|
||
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
||
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
||
- Scope: full review
|
||
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
|
||
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads the language and knows the domain; the stand-in applies S01's role)
|
||
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
||
|
||
## Checklist Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Qualitative, and justified in the Cost–Benefit Assessment (unpaid course assignment, no revenue or budget). |
|
||
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Five risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
|
||
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria table has 7 rows with targets and measures. |
|
||
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate subsections. |
|
||
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and does not re-describe roles. |
|
||
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding conventions. |
|
||
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists. |
|
||
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a rationale. |
|
||
|
||
## Language and Domain Results
|
||
|
||
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`. |
|
||
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
||
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; quoted file names and code stay as they are. |
|
||
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English: outcome-focused, little implementation detail. as the registry says for this type. |
|
||
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No domain dictionary exists yet, so no PO term can contradict one; the IT terms used (Selenium, CSS selector, Docker, headless, driver) are standard and used with one word per concept. Stand-in judgement, open to challenge. |
|
||
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
||
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin file exists beside the document. |
|
||
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; language and domain have not changed. |
|
||
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by `AI as stand-in for S01` (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain, as the registry states). Not independent; open to challenge in the end-of-run summary. |
|
||
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations used (CSS, API, PNG, FURPS+, e2e) are spelled out on first use where they appear. |
|
||
|
||
## Overall Verdict
|
||
|
||
Go — Every Mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes; no Fail. Stand-in review as `AI as stand-in for S01`, not independent: S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary.
|
||
|
||
## Action Items
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||
| None | S01 | n/a |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
||
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
||
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
||
[b344b6e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/048-scrapping-wiki/commit/b344b6e2cba397e23714c73a45ad4155bb1e00e0
|