4.7 KiB
4.7 KiB
RC-001 Review of BC-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-001 |
| CrossReference | BC-001, QC-BC-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Claude (AI) | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version: Go | b344b6e |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: BC-001
- Checklist used: QC-BC-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: none (S01 reads the language and knows the domain; the stand-in applies S01's role)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Qualitative, and justified in the Cost–Benefit Assessment (unpaid course assignment, no revenue or budget). |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Five risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Success Criteria table has 7 rows with targets and measures. |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | ### In Scope and ### Out of Scope are separate subsections. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and does not re-describe roles. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and the coding conventions. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate lists. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a rationale. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; quoted file names and code stay as they are. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is IT Executive English: outcome-focused, little implementation detail. as the registry says for this type. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No domain dictionary exists yet, so no PO term can contradict one; the IT terms used (Selenium, CSS selector, Docker, headless, driver) are standard and used with one word per concept. Stand-in judgement, open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin file exists beside the document. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; language and domain have not changed. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by AI as stand-in for S01 (S01 reads English and knows the IT domain, as the registry states). Not independent; open to challenge in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations used (CSS, API, PNG, FURPS+, e2e) are spelled out on first use where they appear. |
Overall Verdict
Go — Every Mandatory criterion of the type checklist and of QC-LANG-001 passes; no Fail. Stand-in review as AI as stand-in for S01, not independent: S01 can challenge it in the end-of-run summary.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | n/a |