3.9 KiB
3.9 KiB
SQA Review Record: MIL-002 re-review
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-010 |
| CrossReference | MIL-002, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | e764269 |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-002
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001
- Scope: full review (re-review after the wording change of criterion 2; earlier record RC-005)
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer: AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | The deliverable names the branch, the code, the tests and four screenshots. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go/No-Go criterion 2 now says four PNG files, one per step with step 3 before and after Sign Up; all criteria checkable. |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Depends on MIL-001. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceable to BC-001 objectives 1 and 2. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date 2026-11-01 inside the window. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has Language = en and Domain = it. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | IT Executive English for BC, PP and MIL; IT Professional English for SA, as the registry states. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No DICT exists yet; only standard IT terms are used, with no synonyms for one concept. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version: no earlier accepted version, so no language change. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer (AI as stand-in for S01) reads English and knows the IT domain; not independent. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (ADR, PO, CI, FURPS+) are known to the audience or spelled out. |
Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; no blocking finding. Re-review after the wording change of criterion 2 (earlier record RC-005).
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | n/a |