4.8 KiB
4.8 KiB
RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis review
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | SA-001, QC-SA-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | f9765fd |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: SA-001
- Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows)
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the domain IT; mode: AI as stand-in for S01)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01); the author and the stand-in are both the AI working for S01
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and stable |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organisation, power and interest are given for each |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table lists channel, frequency, deliverable and phase |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability Analysis maps each stakeholder to BC-001 objectives |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a business statement and a FURPS+ attribute |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language entries; each stakeholder can find their row |
| 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (CN-NNN) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused |
Pass | CN-001 to CN-006 name the stakeholder who raised them |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata has `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the stand-in reads English |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Executive types use IT Executive English, technical types IT Professional English, as the registry says; plain sentences, no jargon beyond IT terms |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (DICT) exists in this project; terms are used consistently (price, target price, alert, gateway) and no synonyms for them were found |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No <name>.<language>.md twin exists |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change since an earlier accepted version |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reads English and knows the IT domain; not independent of the author (recorded in Mode) |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SMTP, CAPTCHA, ROI, API, QC, ISO/IEC) are spelled out on first use |
Overall Verdict
Go — all criteria pass.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None: no Fail and no Pending criterion | S01 | 2026-10-28 |