# RC-002 Stakeholder Analysis review ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-002 | | CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [f9765fd] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [SA-001] - Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001] - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it (the artifact's Metadata rows) - Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the domain IT; mode: AI as stand-in for S01) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (AI as stand-in for S01); the author and the stand-in are both the AI working for S01 ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant | | 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | IDs S01 to S03 are unique and stable | | 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role, organisation, power and interest are given for each | | 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table lists channel, frequency, deliverable and phase | | 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation | | 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability Analysis maps each stakeholder to BC-001 objectives | | 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern has a business statement and a FURPS+ attribute | | 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short plain-language entries; each stakeholder can find their row | | 9 | Every concern has a stable ID (`CN-NNN`) in the concern register, with the stakeholder who raised it; IDs are never renumbered or reused | Pass | CN-001 to CN-006 name the stakeholder who raised them | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata has `Language | en` and `Domain | it` | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the stand-in reads English | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Executive types use IT Executive English, technical types IT Professional English, as the registry says; plain sentences, no jargon beyond IT terms | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (DICT) exists in this project; terms are used consistently (price, target price, alert, gateway) and no synonyms for them were found | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No `..md` twin exists | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change since an earlier accepted version | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The stand-in reads English and knows the IT domain; not independent of the author (recorded in Mode) | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SMTP, CAPTCHA, ROI, API, QC, ISO/IEC) are spelled out on first use | ## Overall Verdict Go — all criteria pass. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None: no Fail and no Pending criterion | S01 | 2026-10-28 | --- [SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md [QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md [f9765fd]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/047-amazon-price-tracker/commit/f9765fd3743f46c189359e713fd050c8e1a598b6