5.4 KiB
5.4 KiB
Review of GOV-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-004 |
| CrossReference | GOV-001, QC-GOV-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | 01e016e |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: GOV-001
- Checklist used: QC-GOV-001 (
QC-GOV-001) - Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5, 9 in chat on 2026-10-28)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purpose states what is governed and traces to the Business Case's governance and traceability objectives (a framework-level document that cannot cite project artifacts traces to the governance document it supports instead) | Pass | Purpose cites BC-001 O5 and SA-001 CN-002. |
| 2 | Workflow steps are ordered, and every step names the role that performs it | Pass | Six workflow steps, each with a named role. |
| 3 | The RACI covers every in-scope artifact type, with exactly one Accountable per category | Pass | RACI has four categories covering every in-scope type, one Accountable each. |
| 4 | Roles are stakeholder IDs taken exactly from the Stakeholder Analysis; no invented role names | Pass | Only S01, S02, S03 appear. |
| 5 | Each verdict (Go, Go-with-conditions, No-Go) defines the resulting artifact status, using only allowed status values | Pass | Go, Go-with-conditions and No-Go give Accepted, Proposed and returned-to-owner outcomes. |
| 6 | Disputed or No-Go verdicts have an escalation path to a named stakeholder | Pass | Escalation to the ARB Chair S01. |
| 7 | The reviewer-independence rule can be applied: a named alternate exists when the reviewer is the author | Pass | Named alternate: stand-in recorded as AI as stand-in for S01, and S01's later reading. |
| 8 | Review cadence is stated for artifact instances and for the checklists themselves | Pass | Cadence section covers instances and checklists. |
| 9 | The document links the process artifacts it relies on (traceability matrix, review process, process model) | Pass | Links TM-001 and the review process. |
| 10 | Written without duplicated words or unexplained abbreviations | Pass | No duplicated words; ARB, RACI, QC spelled out by the framework text. |
| 11 | A blocking finding (a Fail on a Mandatory criterion, or an open security finding rated High or Critical) gives No-Go; Go-with-conditions is allowed only for findings that do not block |
Pass | Step 5 states the blocking-finding rule. |
| 12 | A risk exception that lets a blocking finding pass names the finding, the owner, an approver who is neither the author nor the owner, an expiry date and the compensating controls; an expired exception is blocking again | Pass | Risk exception fields and expiry are stated. |
| 13 | A criterion only a person can confirm stays Pending until a named reviewer independent of the author confirms it; the author's own assessment, a stand-in's or an AI author's, never closes it |
Pass | Pending rule stated; only S01 closes it. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language en and Domain it are in Metadata. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is BCP 47; it is in the registry domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (the document is English prose). |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register IT Executive English or IT Professional English per the registry table. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28; no dictionary (DICT) exists yet, so the terms are the standard IT terms. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (S01 is the domain expert and reads English). |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out at first use (PO, ARB, QC, FURPS+). |
Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; no blocking finding. Language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28, so none stays Pending.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| None | S01 | - |