# Review of GOV-001 ## Metadata | Key | Value | | --- | --- | | ID | RC-004 | | CrossReference | [GOV-001], [QC-GOV-001] | ## Version History | Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10-28 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [01e016e] | --- ## Artifact Under Review - Instance reviewed: [GOV-001] - Checklist used: [QC-GOV-001] (`QC-GOV-001`) - Scope: full review - Language and domain: en / it - Language reviewer: S01 (confirmed criteria 3, 5, 9 in chat on 2026-10-28) - Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`) ## Checklist Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Purpose states what is governed and traces to the Business Case's governance and traceability objectives (a framework-level document that cannot cite project artifacts traces to the governance document it supports instead) | Pass | Purpose cites BC-001 O5 and SA-001 CN-002. | | 2 | Workflow steps are ordered, and every step names the role that performs it | Pass | Six workflow steps, each with a named role. | | 3 | The RACI covers every in-scope artifact type, with exactly one Accountable per category | Pass | RACI has four categories covering every in-scope type, one Accountable each. | | 4 | Roles are stakeholder IDs taken exactly from the Stakeholder Analysis; no invented role names | Pass | Only S01, S02, S03 appear. | | 5 | Each verdict (Go, Go-with-conditions, No-Go) defines the resulting artifact status, using only allowed status values | Pass | Go, Go-with-conditions and No-Go give Accepted, Proposed and returned-to-owner outcomes. | | 6 | Disputed or No-Go verdicts have an escalation path to a named stakeholder | Pass | Escalation to the ARB Chair S01. | | 7 | The reviewer-independence rule can be applied: a named alternate exists when the reviewer is the author | Pass | Named alternate: stand-in recorded as `AI as stand-in for S01`, and S01's later reading. | | 8 | Review cadence is stated for artifact instances and for the checklists themselves | Pass | Cadence section covers instances and checklists. | | 9 | The document links the process artifacts it relies on (traceability matrix, review process, process model) | Pass | Links TM-001 and the review process. | | 10 | Written without duplicated words or unexplained abbreviations | Pass | No duplicated words; ARB, RACI, QC spelled out by the framework text. | | 11 | A blocking finding (a `Fail` on a Mandatory criterion, or an open security finding rated High or Critical) gives `No-Go`; `Go-with-conditions` is allowed only for findings that do not block | Pass | Step 5 states the blocking-finding rule. | | 12 | A risk exception that lets a blocking finding pass names the finding, the owner, an approver who is neither the author nor the owner, an expiry date and the compensating controls; an expired exception is blocking again | Pass | Risk exception fields and expiry are stated. | | 13 | A criterion only a person can confirm stays `Pending` until a named reviewer independent of the author confirms it; the author's own assessment, a stand-in's or an AI author's, never closes it | Pass | Pending rule stated; only S01 closes it. | ## Language and Domain Results | # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Language `en` and Domain `it` are in Metadata. | | 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is BCP 47; `it` is in the registry domain list. | | 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (the document is English prose). | | 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register `IT Executive English` or `IT Professional English` per the registry table. | | 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28; no dictionary (DICT) exists yet, so the terms are the standard IT terms. | | 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. | | 7 | No translated twin (`..md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists. | | 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no language change. | | 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | Confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28 (S01 is the domain expert and reads English). | | 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out at first use (PO, ARB, QC, FURPS+). | ## Overall Verdict Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; no blocking finding. Language criteria 3, 5 and 9 were confirmed by S01 in chat on 2026-10-28, so none stays `Pending`. ## Action Items | Action | Owner | Due | | --- | --- | --- | | None | S01 | - | --- [GOV-001]: ../governance.md [QC-GOV-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-governance.md [01e016e]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/046-scraping-the-billboard/commit/01e016e15dd93cface4f4ae9e9e99919e0aace2b