Files
031-flash-card/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-013-adr-0001.md
T
Tirsvad c3fbcbcfaf Add the plan baseline: business case, stakeholders, plan, design and milestones
Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, use case chain
(UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT), three ADRs, milestones
MIL-001 to MIL-007, the traceability matrix and 22 review records
(autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
2026-10-14 21:33:25 +08:00

55 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

# RC-013: Review of ADR-0001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-013 |
| CrossReference | [ADR-0001], [QC-ADR-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [ADR-0001]
- Checklist used: [QC-ADR-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
- Language reviewer: none
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The ID (`ADR-NNNN`, 4-digit) matches the filename number and is unique and sequential | Pass | ID `ADR-0001` matches the file name number. |
| 2 | Context states the problem, the forces (cost, risk, constraints) and the options evaluated | Pass | Context states the problem, the stakeholders' forces and three options. |
| 3 | At least two options were considered, or the absence of alternatives is justified | Pass | Three options were considered. |
| 4 | Decision is stated in one or two unhedged sentences and matches one of the evaluated options | Pass | Decision is stated plainly and is option 2. |
| 5 | Consequences list both Positive and Negative outcomes | Pass | Consequences have Positive and Negative lists. |
| 6 | Quality-attribute impacts (performance, security, portability, etc.) are named where the decision affects them | Pass | Portability, reliability (no network needed) and maintainability are named. |
| 7 | Affected Artifacts are listed as links, and each is also in CrossReference | Pass | Affected Artifacts BC-001 and SA-001 are listed and in CrossReference. |
| 8 | Status changes are recorded as new Version History rows with a Change summary and Commit link; retained rows are never rewritten | Pass | First version; no status change yet. |
| 9 | A superseded or deprecated ADR names its successor, and the successor links back | N-A | Not superseded or deprecated. |
| 10 | Written in business or technical language of the domain, with no unexplained abbreviations | Pass | Written in plain technical English; `gTTS`, `playsound` are product names. |
| 11 | Status is one of `Proposed`, `Accepted`, `Rejected`, `Deprecated` or `Superseded by ADR-NNNN`, and every Version History row uses only these | Pass | Status `Proposed` before this review; uses an allowed value. |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| none | - | - |
---
[ADR-0001]: ../../../docs/adr/adr-0001-standard-library-and-optional-speech.md
[QC-ADR-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-adr.md