Tirsvad
c3fbcbcfaf
Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, use case chain (UCD, US, UC, DM, SSD, OC, SD, DCD, DICT), three ADRs, milestones MIL-001 to MIL-007, the traceability matrix and 22 review records (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
72 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
# RC-006: Review of UC-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-006 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [UC-001], [QC-UC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [UC-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-UC-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario | N-A | The format is Fully Dressed; the Brief format criterion does not apply. |
|
|
| 2 | Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure | N-A | The format is Fully Dressed; the Casual format criterion does not apply. |
|
|
| 3 | All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows | Pass | Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, main success scenario and extensions are present. |
|
|
| 4 | Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined | Pass | Preconditions and postconditions are listed. |
|
|
| 5 | Primary actor is explicitly stated | Pass | Primary actor is `Learner`. |
|
|
| 6 | Stakeholders and their interests are stated | Pass | Stakeholders S01 and S02 and their interests are stated. |
|
|
| 7 | Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps | Pass | Main success scenario has 7 numbered steps. |
|
|
| 8 | Alternative/exception flows correctly reference `<<include>>`/`<<extend>>` use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 | Pass | UCD-001 has no include or extend relationship, so no extension needs to reference one; the extensions are plain alternative flows. |
|
|
| 9 | Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text | Pass | The Business Rules table gives a rule per step. |
|
|
| 10 | Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories | Pass | Title and actor match UCD-001 and US-001. |
|
|
| 11 | Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated | Pass | `Level: user-goal` and `Scope: Flash Card program`. |
|
|
| 12 | Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail | Pass | Steps are written as goals and answers; buttons, files and milliseconds are in the wireframe and milestones. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of UC-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[UC-001]: ../../../docs/uc-001/uc.md
|
|
[QC-UC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-use-case.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|