Tirsvad
9c8e294021
Milestone MIL-010, story US-001.08, BC-001 and PP-001 amended (the release of the executable is in scope), CHANGELOG.md for 0.1.0, and links to the release page in README and the Install page of the wiki. Review records RC-051 to RC-054, all Go (autonomous mode, not independent). Task: MIL-010#1 Task: MIL-010#2
5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
RC-051: Review of BC-001
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-051 |
| CrossReference | BC-001, QC-BC-001, QC-LANG-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: BC-001
- Checklist used: QC-BC-001, and QC-LANG-001 (language and domain)
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | The Cost-Benefit table is qualitative and says why: no revenue is expected, so a quantitative return does not apply. |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | The Risks table has 5 risks, each with an impact and a mitigation. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | The Success Criteria table has 8 rows with numeric targets and a measure each (for example 0 third-party packages; 5 commands or fewer). |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | Scope has ### In Scope and ### Out of Scope; the release of the executable is In Scope, an installer and signing stay Out of Scope. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 and does not re-describe their roles. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | Methodological and Standards Foundation names the framework, Larman, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and PEP 8. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | Recommendation reads Proceed with a one-sentence rationale. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Metadata of BC-001 has `Language |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code and it is a value of the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in docs/). |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
Full review (not a delta) after the change for MIL-010 (release).
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |