71 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
# RC-031: Review of US-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-031 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [US-001], [QC-US-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-14 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [0b983b7] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [US-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-US-001], and [QC-LANG-001] (language and domain)
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (the stand-in for S01 reads the language and knows the domain)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Follows INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable) | Pass | INVEST Check section confirms the six properties for all six stories and states one dependency exception. |
|
|
| 2 | Written in "As a / I want / So that" form | Pass | All six stories use `As a / I want / so that`. |
|
|
| 3 | Clear, testable acceptance criteria are included | Pass | Every story, including US-001.06, has Given/When/Then acceptance criteria. |
|
|
| 4 | Traceable to a use case or epic | Pass | Every story traces to a milestone and to UC-001. |
|
|
| 5 | Story is sized to fit within a single iteration | Pass | Each story is one milestone, which fits one iteration. |
|
|
| 6 | Story statement avoids technical implementation detail | Fail | Acceptance criteria name `words_to_learn.csv`, `ms-da.csv` and 3000 ms, which are assignment-mandated names and values rather than pure behaviour. |
|
|
| 7 | Role named in the story matches an actor defined in the Use Case Diagram | Pass | The role `Learner` is the actor of UCD-001. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | Metadata of US-001 has `Language | en` and `Domain | it`; neither is a placeholder. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code and `it` is a value of the registry's domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | Prose and table cells are English; Malay and Danish words and file names appear only as quoted data. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives `IT Professional English` for this type; the text is written for that reader. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | The PO terms of DICT-001 (flash card, word list, words to learn, study session) are used and no synonym replaces them. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin exists beside the document (checked in `docs/`). |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain since an earlier accepted version. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The reviewer is the stand-in for S01, the Product Owner, who reads English and knows the IT domain; no second language reviewer is needed (review-checklist-process step 2). Open to challenge by S01 in the end-of-run summary. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Fail | CSV, MVVM, UI, PO and similar abbreviations are not all spelled out at first use; Optional, deferred. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes; the failed Optional criteria are deferred with an action item. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
|
|
|
Full review (not a delta) after the level choice was added for MIL-008.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Criterion 6 (Optional) failed: Story statement avoids technical implementation detail; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
|
| Criterion LANG 10 (Optional) failed: Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language; fix or accept the deferral | S01 | 2026-10-21 |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[US-001]: ../../../docs/user-stories.md
|
|
[QC-US-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-user-story.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|
|
[0b983b7]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/031-flash-card/commit/0b983b7fdadf6958717c1d0227d0f2ebe037f7b1
|