56 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
56 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# RC-075: Review of ADR-0005
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-075 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [ADR-0005], [QC-ADR-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-15 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | [f86bc91] |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [ADR-0005]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-ADR-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
|
|
- Language reviewer: none
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The ID (`ADR-NNNN`, 4-digit) matches the filename number and is unique and sequential | Pass | ID `ADR-0005` matches the file name number. |
|
|
| 2 | Context states the problem, the forces (cost, risk, constraints) and the options evaluated | Pass | Context states the problem (the host desktop is taken over) and four options. |
|
|
| 3 | At least two options were considered, or the absence of alternatives is justified | Pass | Four options were considered. |
|
|
| 4 | Decision is stated in one or two unhedged sentences and matches one of the evaluated options | Pass | Decision is stated plainly and is option 2. |
|
|
| 5 | Consequences list both Positive and Negative outcomes | Pass | Consequences have Positive and Negative lists. |
|
|
| 6 | Quality-attribute impacts (performance, security, portability, etc.) are named where the decision affects them | Pass | Portability, repeatability, image size and the weaker fallback are named. |
|
|
| 7 | Affected Artifacts are listed as links, and each is also in CrossReference | Pass | Affected Artifacts BC-001 and ADR-0004 are listed and in CrossReference. |
|
|
| 8 | Status changes are recorded as new Version History rows with a Change summary and Commit link; retained rows are never rewritten | Pass | First version; no status change yet. |
|
|
| 9 | A superseded or deprecated ADR names its successor, and the successor links back | N-A | Not superseded or deprecated. |
|
|
| 10 | Written in business or technical language of the domain, with no unexplained abbreviations | Pass | Written in plain technical English; product names are as the vendors write them. |
|
|
| 11 | Status is one of `Proposed`, `Accepted`, `Rejected`, `Deprecated` or `Superseded by ADR-NNNN`, and every Version History row uses only these | Pass | Status `Proposed` before this review; uses an allowed value. |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| none | - | - |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[ADR-0005]: ../../../docs/adr/adr-0005-container-and-sandbox-checks.md
|
|
[QC-ADR-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-adr.md
|
|
[f86bc91]: https://git.tirsystem.com/Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/031-flash-card/commit/f86bc9136e7719fbcd049a4f803959019b7d2df3
|