Files
031-flash-card/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-009-operation-contracts.md

2.3 KiB

RC-009: Review of OC-001

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-009
CrossReference OC-001, QC-OC-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-14 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen AI as stand-in for S01 Initial version c3fbcbc

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: OC-001
  • Checklist used: QC-OC-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: n/a (technical type)
  • Language reviewer: none
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Method signature is complete: operation name, parameter types, and return type Pass Each contract gives name, parameter list and return type (`startStudySession(): CardDto
2 Preconditions explicitly list required state before execution Pass Preconditions are listed per contract.
3 Postconditions explicitly describe resulting state using Larman's "instance created/associated/attribute modified" style Pass Postconditions use created / associated / destroyed / attribute set wording.
4 Exceptions and error conditions are documented, including the triggering precondition failure Pass Each contract has an Exceptions table with the failing precondition.
5 Operation is explicitly traceable to a single SSD message Pass Each contract traces to exactly one SSD message; the timer step has none and says so.
6 Contract avoids specifying implementation/algorithmic details (declarative, not procedural) Pass Postconditions are declarative.
7 Cross-references the Domain Model classes/associations affected by pre/postconditions Pass Domain Model concepts and IT terms are cited per contract.

Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion passes. Reviewed by AI as stand-in for S01; not independent of the author.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
none - -