030-password-manager/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-business-case.md

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-001
CrossReference	BC-001, [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001]

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-14	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Initial version	53f56ee

---

Review of BC-001

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: BC-001
• Checklist used: [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001]
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: S01 (reads English and the IT domain; confirmed in chat by replying "accepted" to the plan message that asked for it)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified	Pass	Cost-Benefit is qualitative and the section says why (unpaid learning exercise, no revenue).
2	Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation	Pass	Risks table lists five risks, each with impact and mitigation.
3	Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations	Pass	Success Criteria table has 7 rows with numeric targets and a measure each.
4	Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope	Pass	### In Scope and ### Out of Scope are separate subsections.
5	Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline	Pass	Stakeholders table cites S01, S02, S03 from [SA-001]; no role is re-described.
6	Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman)	Pass	Methodological and Standards Foundation names Larman, ISO/IEC 25010 and Clean Architecture.
7	Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another	Pass	Assumptions and Constraints are separate bullet lists.
8	Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation	Pass	Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with rationale.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	Language en and Domain it rows are present and filled.
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is BCP 47; it is in the registry's domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English; headings are English.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	Register IT Executive English per the registry; the text matches the reader it assumes.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	PO terms of [DICT-001] (password entry, password file, search, window) are used; no synonym found.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No *.en.md or other translated twin exists beside the file.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version: no language change since an earlier accepted version.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	S01 is the language reviewer and confirmed the English text and IT terms.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations (PO, MVVM, JSON) are spelled out or defined where first used.

Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion passes.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	-

---