Files
026-nato-alphabet/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-012-uc-001.md
T
Tirsvad 93c88b4d41
CI / Test on Python 3.13 (pull_request) Successful in 59s
Review MIL-002 deliverables and resolve pending commit links
2026-10-13 16:39:06 +08:00

4.9 KiB

SQA Review Record RC-012: UC-001

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-012
CrossReference UC-001, QC-UC-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-13 Accepted Jens Tirsvad Nielsen AI as stand-in for S01 Review of UC-001 1b7da4b

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: UC-001
  • Checklist used: QC-UC-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: en / it
  • Language reviewer: none
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Consists of a single, concise paragraph summarizing only the primary success scenario N-A Format is Fully Dressed, not Brief.
2 Written as an informal multi-paragraph narrative; may mention some alternate flows without formal structure N-A Format is Fully Dressed, not Casual.
3 All standard sections are present: actors, preconditions, postconditions, main success scenario, alternative/exception flows Pass Scope, level, actor, stakeholders, pre- and postconditions, main scenario, extensions, rules and open issues are present.
4 Preconditions and postconditions are explicitly defined Pass Preconditions and postconditions are stated.
5 Primary actor is explicitly stated Pass Primary actor: User.
6 Stakeholders and their interests are stated Pass S01 and S02 with their interests.
7 Main success scenario is written as clear, numbered steps Pass Four numbered steps.
8 Alternative/exception flows correctly reference <<include>>/<<extend>> use cases where relevant, per UML 2.5.1 N-A No other use case exists, so no include or extend is relevant; the alternative flow 3a is a plain extension.
9 Explicit business rules are captured per step where applicable, rather than embedded loosely in narrative text Pass A Special Requirements table gives a rule per step.
10 Naming of actors and use case title is consistent with the corresponding Use Case Diagram and User Stories Pass Actor and title match [UCD-001] and [US-001].
11 Scope/level (e.g. summary, user-goal, subfunction) is explicitly stated Pass Level: user-goal; scope: NATO alphabet tool.
12 Use case is written from the actor's goal perspective, free of UI or implementation detail Pass Written from the goal of the User, with no interface detail.

Language and Domain Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder Pass `Language
2 Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list Pass en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list.
3 The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language Pass All prose and table cells are English. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English.
4 The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type Pass The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it.
5 Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms Pass No dictionary (DICT) exists; the terms user, word, letter and code word are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge.
6 Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English Pass Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7 No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document Pass No translated twin exists.
8 A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again Pass First version; no change of language or domain.
9 A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly Pass Software and IT domain, English language; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary.
10 Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language Pass Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers.

Overall Verdict

Go — every applicable Mandatory criterion passes. The task summary of MIL-002 said "brief"; the use case is Fully Dressed so that the system sequence diagram can follow its steps one by one.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None S01 n/a