Tirsvad
32a8b848c5
Task: MIL-001#1 Refs #2 Refs #3 Refs #4 Refs #5 Refs #6
1.9 KiB
ADR-0002 Skip the optional analysis artifacts
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | ADR-0002 |
| CrossReference | BC-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version, reviewed in RC-007 | pending |
Allowed Status values: Proposed, Accepted, Rejected, Deprecated, Superseded by ADR-NNNN.
Context
The journey of the framework offers analysis documents beyond the baseline: KPI definitions, a Business Model Canvas, a BPMN process model and a riskiest-assumption test. The project is a single-evening course exercise with six measurable success criteria already in BC-001, no commercial model, no business process and no costly belief to test.
Options evaluated:
- Write all four documents: complete, but each needs a review and adds no decision that the Business Case does not already hold.
- Write only the KPI definitions: the success criteria would be restated in another file.
- Skip all four and record the reason here.
Decision
Skip the KPI definitions, the Business Model Canvas, the BPMN process model and the riskiest-assumption test. The Business Case's Success Criteria table carries the measures, and the baseline documents (Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, milestones) are not skipped.
Consequences
Positive:
- Less documentation to keep consistent for a small project.
- The success criteria are stated once, in one place.
Negative:
- A reader who expects a KPI document finds the measures in the Business Case instead.
- If the project grows (a package published, more users), the skipped documents must be written then.
Affected Artifacts
- BC-001 — its Success Criteria stay the only definition of the measures.