Tirsvad
7212302fb9
Accepts BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 with review records RC-001 to RC-005 (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
68 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# SQA Review Record RC-001: BC-001
|
|
|
|
## Metadata
|
|
| Key | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| ID | RC-001 |
|
|
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of BC-001 | pending |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Under Review
|
|
|
|
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
|
|
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
|
|
- Scope: full review
|
|
- Language and domain: en / it
|
|
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
|
|
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit is qualitative and the section states why (personal learning exercise, no revenue). |
|
|
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Five risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
|
|
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Six success criteria, each with a numeric or checkable target and a measure. |
|
|
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate subsections. |
|
|
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 from [SA-001]; roles are not re-described. |
|
|
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | The foundation section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and Clean Architecture. |
|
|
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
|
|
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | The Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a rationale. |
|
|
|
|
## Language and Domain Results
|
|
|
|
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
|
|
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
|
|
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
|
|
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
|
|
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
|
|
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
|
|
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
|
|
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
|
|
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
|
|
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
|
|
|
|
## Overall Verdict
|
|
|
|
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-BC-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
|
|
|
|
## Action Items
|
|
|
|
| Action | Owner | Due |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| None | S01 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
|
|
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
|
|
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
|