Tirsvad-Udemy-100-days-of-code/026-nato-alphabet
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add baseline: Business Case, Stakeholder Analysis, Project Plan, milestones and reviews

Browse Source 
Accepts BC-001, SA-001, PP-001 and MIL-001 to MIL-003 with review records
RC-001 to RC-005 (autonomous mode, AI as stand-in for S01).
This commit is contained in:
Tirsvad
2026-10-13 16:20:36 +08:00
parent 8736aad171
commit 7212302fb9
15 changed files with 977 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-001-business-case.md
+67
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
# SQA Review Record RC-001: BC-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-001 |
| CrossReference | [BC-001], [QC-BC-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of BC-001 | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [BC-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-BC-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | ROI/Cost-Benefit analysis is quantitative, or where qualitative, is explicitly justified | Pass | Cost-Benefit is qualitative and the section states why (personal learning exercise, no revenue). |
| 2 | Risks are identified with documented impact and mitigation | Pass | Five risks, each with impact and mitigation. |
| 3 | Success criteria are measurable, stating explicit targets rather than vague aspirations | Pass | Six success criteria, each with a numeric or checkable target and a measure. |
| 4 | Scope explicitly separates In Scope vs Out of Scope | Pass | `### In Scope` and `### Out of Scope` are separate subsections. |
| 5 | Stakeholders are cross-referenced to Stakeholder Analysis IDs rather than re-described inline | Pass | The Stakeholders table cites S01, S02 and S03 from [SA-001]; roles are not re-described. |
| 6 | Methodology and quality-standard foundation are stated explicitly (e.g. ISO/IEC 25010, Larman) | Pass | The foundation section names the framework, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and Clean Architecture. |
| 7 | Assumptions and constraints are explicit and clearly distinguished from one another | Pass | Assumptions and Constraints are separate sections. |
| 8 | Document supports executive decision-making with a clear, unambiguous recommendation | Pass | The Recommendation is a single "Proceed" with a rationale. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-BC-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |
---
[BC-001]: ../../business-case.md
[QC-BC-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-business-case.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
+67
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
# SQA Review Record RC-002: SA-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-002 |
| CrossReference | [SA-001], [QC-SA-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of SA-001 | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [SA-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-SA-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries | Pass | S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant. |
| 2 | Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts | Pass | Stable IDs S01 to S03, used by the other artifacts. |
| 3 | Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description | Pass | Role and organization are stated with explicit HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels. |
| 4 | Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones | Pass | Communication table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones. |
| 5 | Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies | Pass | Two conflicts, each with a mitigation. |
| 6 | Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives | Pass | Traceability table cites [BC-001] objectives O1 to O5. |
| 7 | Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) | Pass | Each concern is mapped to a FURPS+ attribute. |
| 8 | Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry | Pass | Short tables; each entry reads on its own. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-SA-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |
---
[SA-001]: ../../stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-SA-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-stakeholder-analysis.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-003-mil-001.md
+65
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# SQA Review Record RC-003: MIL-001
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-003 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-001], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of MIL-001 | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-001]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete output: project configuration, skeleton, Doxyfile, CI workflow, ADRs, description and topics. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable rows (commands and counts). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table is filled. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites [BC-001] objectives. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the Project Plan window; the Business Case sets no calendar constraint. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-MIL-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |
---
[MIL-001]: ../../milestones/mil-001-repository-foundation.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-004-mil-002.md
+65
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# SQA Review Record RC-004: MIL-002
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-004 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-002], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of MIL-002 | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-002]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete output: working console program, tests, Doxygen comments, user story and use case. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable rows (commands and counts). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table is filled. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites [BC-001] objectives. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the Project Plan window; the Business Case sets no calendar constraint. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-MIL-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |
---
[MIL-002]: ../../milestones/mil-002-nato-converter.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md
docs/sqa/reviews/rc-005-mil-003.md
+65
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# SQA Review Record RC-005: MIL-003
## Metadata
| Key | Value |
| --- | --- |
| ID | RC-005 |
| CrossReference | [MIL-003], [QC-MIL-001], [QC-LANG-001] |
## Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2026-10-13 | Accepted | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Review of MIL-003 | pending |
---
## Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: [MIL-003]
- Checklist used: [QC-MIL-001] and [QC-LANG-001]
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is `AI as stand-in for S01`)
## Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names concrete output: README, screenshots and wiki in three languages. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has objectively checkable rows (commands and counts). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table is filled. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability cites [BC-001] objectives. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Owner and approving reviewer are S01. |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target date lies inside the Project Plan window; the Business Case sets no calendar constraint. |
## Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | The Metadata table has a `Language` row and a `Domain` row, and neither is a placeholder | Pass | `Language | en` and `Domain | it` are in the Metadata table. |
| 2 | `Language` is a BCP 47 code and `Domain` is a value from the registry's domain list | Pass | `en` is a BCP 47 code; `it` is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | The registry gives IT Executive English for this type; the text matches it. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | No dictionary (`DICT`) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (`<name>.<language>.md`) exists beside the document | Pass | No translated twin of the file exists. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | Pass | First version; no change of language or domain. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names). |
## Overall Verdict
Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-MIL-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.
## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
| --- | --- | --- |
| None | S01 | n/a |
---
[MIL-003]: ../../milestones/mil-003-documentation-and-publication.md
[QC-MIL-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-milestones-gateways.md
[QC-LANG-001]: ../../../framework/qc/artifacts/qc-language-domain.md