026-nato-alphabet/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md

SQA Review Record RC-002: SA-001

Metadata

Key	Value
ID	RC-002
CrossReference	SA-001, QC-SA-001, QC-LANG-001

Version History

Date	Status	Author	Reviewer	Change	Commit
2026-10-13	Accepted	Jens Tirsvad Nielsen	AI as stand-in for S01	Review of SA-001	pending

---

Artifact Under Review

• Instance reviewed: SA-001
• Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and QC-LANG-001
• Scope: full review
• Language and domain: en / it
• Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads the language and knows the domain)
• Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01)

Checklist Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries	Pass	S01, S02 and S03 each have Power, Interest and Quadrant.
2	Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts	Pass	Stable IDs S01 to S03, used by the other artifacts.
3	Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description	Pass	Role and organization are stated with explicit HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW levels.
4	Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones	Pass	Communication table maps channel, frequency and deliverable to milestones.
5	Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies	Pass	Two conflicts, each with a mitigation.
6	Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives	Pass	Traceability table cites [BC-001] objectives O1 to O5.
7	Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+)	Pass	Each concern is mapped to a FURPS+ attribute.
8	Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry	Pass	Short tables; each entry reads on its own.

Language and Domain Results

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence/Notes
1	The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder	Pass	`Language
2	Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list	Pass	en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list.
3	The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language	Pass	All prose and table cells are English; the course title is quoted source text. Checked by the stand-in reviewer, who reads English.
4	The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type	Pass	The registry gives IT Professional English for this type; the text matches it.
5	Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms	Pass	No dictionary (DICT) exists yet; the terms letter, code word and NATO alphabet are used consistently with no synonyms. Checked by the stand-in; open to challenge.
6	Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English	Pass	Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English.
7	No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document	Pass	No translated twin of the file exists.
8	A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again	Pass	First version; no change of language or domain.
9	A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly	Pass	The domain is software and IT and the language English; the reviewer stood in for (S01) reads both. A person may challenge this in the run summary.
10	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language	Pass	Abbreviations are spelled out on first use or are identifiers (IDs, tool names).

Overall Verdict

Go — every Mandatory criterion of QC-SA-001 and of QC-LANG-001 passes. The review is a stand-in review by the author's AI and is not independent; it is open to challenge in the run summary.

Action Items

Action	Owner	Due
None	S01	n/a

---