Files
025-us-states-game/docs/sqa/reviews/rc-002-stakeholder-analysis.md
Tirsvad 22f19c188b Add repository baseline: layout, tooling, assets, README, Doxyfile and CI (MIL-001)
Task: MIL-001#1
Task: MIL-001#2
Task: MIL-001#3
Task: MIL-001#4
Task: MIL-001#5
Task: MIL-001#6
2026-10-13 15:46:00 +08:00

4.7 KiB

SQA Review Record

Metadata

Key Value
ID RC-002
CrossReference SA-001, QC-SA-001

Version History

Date Status Author Reviewer Change Commit
2026-10-13 Proposed Claude (AI) for S01 AI as stand-in for S01 Initial review record: Go b113e6e

Artifact Under Review

  • Instance reviewed: SA-001
  • Checklist used: QC-SA-001 and QC-LANG-001
  • Scope: full review
  • Language and domain: en / it
  • Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the domain, as stand-in for S01)
  • Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is AI as stand-in for S01; the author is the same AI)

Checklist Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 Power/Interest grid is filled for every stakeholder, with no gaps or unclassified entries Pass S01, S02, S03 each have power, interest and quadrant.
2 Each stakeholder is assigned a unique, stable ID (e.g. S01-S11 style) reusable for RACI assignments in other artifacts Pass S01, S02, S03; used by the Business Case, plan and milestones.
3 Roles and organizational context are defined with explicit Power and Interest levels, not just narrative description Pass Role, organisation, power and interest in the summary table.
4 Communication needs (channel, frequency, deliverable type) are mapped to project phases or milestones Pass Communication table names milestone for each stakeholder.
5 Conflicting stakeholder interests are identified with documented mitigation or resolution strategies Pass Two conflicts, each with a mitigation.
6 Stakeholder concerns are explicitly traced to Business Case objectives Pass Business Goal Alignment table cites [BC-001] objectives.
7 Primary concerns are expressed in both business language and a recognized quality-attribute mapping (e.g. FURPS+) Pass Concerns table with FURPS+ attribute.
8 Document is understandable and navigable by non-technical stakeholders reviewing their own entry Pass One table row per stakeholder, plain wording.

Language and Domain Results

# Criterion Status Evidence/Notes
1 The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder Pass Language = en, Domain = it in Metadata.
2 Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list Pass en; it is in the registry's domain table.
3 The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language Pass All prose and cells are English. Checked by the stand-in for S01, who reads English.
4 The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type Pass IT Professional English: concrete technical terms and checkable statements.
5 Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms Pass No DICT exists for domain it and none is in the plan; the document uses standard Python and software terms consistently (for example states_to_learn.csv, missing_states, Doxygen). Recorded as a stand-in decision.
6 Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English Pass All structural vocabulary is English.
7 No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document Pass check-languages.sh reports no twin.
8 A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again Pass First version; no earlier accepted version.
9 A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly Pass The reviewer, AI as stand-in for S01, reads English and the software domain; no second language reviewer is named. S01 is the Product Owner and reads both; a person may challenge this in the run summary.
10 Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language Pass The only abbreviations are stakeholder IDs (S01 and so on), defined by the summary table, and FURPS+ (functionality, usability, reliability, performance, supportability plus), named in the method of the Purpose.

Overall Verdict

Go - The Stakeholder Analysis meets its checklist. Every Mandatory criterion of both checklists passes.

Action Items

Action Owner Due
None S01