5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
RC-006: Review of MIL-003
Metadata
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
| ID | RC-006 |
| CrossReference | MIL-003, QC-MIL-001, QC-LANG-001, DICT-001 |
Version History
| Date | Status | Author | Reviewer | Change | Commit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Proposed | Jens Tirsvad Nielsen | AI as stand-in for S01 | Initial version | pending |
Artifact Under Review
- Instance reviewed: MIL-003
- Checklist used: QC-MIL-001 and, for the language and domain, QC-LANG-001
- Scope: full review
- Language and domain: en / it
- Language reviewer: none (the reviewer reads English and knows the IT domain)
- Mode: autonomous, not independent (the reviewer is
AI as stand-in for S01; the assistant also drafted the document)
Checklist Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A concrete deliverable is defined for every gate | Pass | Deliverable section names the files and results evaluated; 7 tasks are rows in ## Tasks. |
| 2 | Explicit Go/No-Go criteria are stated for each gate | Pass | Go / No-Go table has 12 criteria, each with an observable Go and No-Go (exit codes, text, file content, warnings). |
| 3 | Dependencies on other milestones are explicitly mapped | Pass | Dependencies table names the milestone that must be accepted and merged first. |
| 4 | Each milestone is traceable to a Business Case objective or KPI | Pass | Traceability table cites [BC-001] objectives 2, 3, 4 and 7 and the Success Criteria numbers. |
| 5 | Milestone owner and approving reviewer are identified | Pass | Ownership table: Owner S01, Approving reviewer S01 (a stakeholder ID of [SA-001]). |
| 6 | Milestone has a defined target date consistent with project constraints | Pass | Target Date is inside the plan window of [PP-001] (ends 2026-10-25) and the Business Case constraint. |
Language and Domain Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Metadata table has a Language row and a Domain row, and neither is a placeholder |
Pass | Language is en and Domain is it in Metadata. |
| 2 | Language is a BCP 47 code and Domain is a value from the registry's domain list |
Pass | en is a BCP 47 code; it is in the registry's domain list. |
| 3 | The content (prose and table cells) is written in the stated language | Pass | All prose and table cells of MIL-003 are English. |
| 4 | The register matches the one the registry gives for the artifact type | Pass | Register is the one the registry gives for the type; code names and commands appear in backticks only where a check needs them. |
| 5 | Domain terms are the PO terms of the domain's dictionary, with no synonyms | Pass | Terms are those of DICT-001: score, high score, reset, continuous play, data file, scoreboard, snake, segment, head, tail, food; game over appears only for the base's behaviour and as the removed game_over identifier, as the dictionary's rules allow. |
| 6 | Metadata keys, section headings, IDs and statuses are in English | Pass | Metadata keys, headings, IDs and statuses are English. |
| 7 | No translated twin (<name>.<language>.md) exists beside the document |
Pass | docs/ holds one file per artifact; there is no <name>.<language>.md. |
| 8 | A change of language or domain since the previous accepted version has a Version History row and was reviewed again | N-A | First version of the document: there is no earlier accepted version. |
| 9 | A reviewer competent in the domain, and in the language, has confirmed that the domain terms are used correctly | Pass | The assistant, as stand-in for S01, reads English and knows the IT domain and checked the terms against DICT-001; task titles and criteria use dictionary terms. |
| 10 | Abbreviations are spelled out on first use, in the stated language | Pass | Abbreviations (SQA, QC, PEP, CI, API, PyPI, FURPS+, RACI, ISO/IEC) are spelled out or defined on first use, or are standard names. |
Overall Verdict
Go — all Mandatory criteria pass or are not applicable. The rows above were assessed on 2026-10-13 by the assistant that drafted the document, as stand-in for S01 in autonomous mode (chosen by S01 in chat on 2026-10-13). Mode: autonomous, not independent. This review is not independent: the drafter and the reviewer are the same assistant, and author and approver (S01) are one person in a single-participant project. S01 accepted the plan in chat on 2026-10-13; the verdict can be challenged in the run summary or on the pull request.
Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
Challenge this Go in the run summary or on the pull request if the stand-in decision is not wanted |
S01 | 2026-10-15 |